0
Why archaeological sources are the main sources for studying the harappan civilizationwhy?
Archaeological sources are the primary means of studying the Harappan Civilization because this ancient society, which thrived around 2500 BCE in the Indus Valley, left behind no decipherable written records. Excavated sites, artifacts, urban planning, and material culture provide critical insights into their social structure, economy, and daily life. These physical remnants, such as pottery, seals, and city layouts, allow researchers to reconstruct the civilization's complexities and understand its historical context. Furthermore, archaeological evidence helps to fill gaps in knowledge that written sources typically address in other ancient cultures.
What else can I help you with?
What are the main sources of history?
The main sources of history can be summarized by the following: * archaeological findings which reveal many aspects of history; * the writings of prior historians; * the writings of primary figures in history such as the works of Plato; and * studying oral history that was later placed in writing.
What are the important sources of studying history?
try to avoid sleeping in the history class
What do historians ask when examining primary sources from the past?
Historians ask questions about the credibility, context, and perspective of primary sources from the past to understand the events, people, and societies they are studying.
What is the difference between oral sources and other historical sources?
Oral sources are made up of living memories, that is people describing events that they have lived through (your own grandparents, as an example) and histories and stories handed down through many years. Before the invention of writing, most history was passed on in this way. Other sources would be written, artistic (paintings, sculpture) and the archaeological records left by buildings, tools and other items in use at the time.
Where do historians get information from?
Historians gather information from a variety of sources, including primary sources like letters, official documents, diaries, and photographs, which provide firsthand accounts of historical events. They also consult secondary sources, such as books, articles, and analyses produced by other historians, to gain context and interpretations. Additionally, oral histories and archaeological findings can offer valuable insights into past societies and cultures. By critically evaluating and synthesizing these diverse sources, historians construct narratives and understand historical developments.
What are the types of archaeological sources?
the important archaeological sources of studying history include monuments and sites, inscriptions, edicts, tools, and weapons and cultural evidences.
What are the different types of archaeological source?
the important archaeological sources of studying history include monuments and sites, inscriptions, edicts, tools, and weapons and cultural evidences.
What are the different source of archaeology?
the important archaeological sources of studying history include monuments and sites, inscriptions, edicts, tools, and weapons and cultural evidences.
What are the different types of source?
the important archaeological sources of studying history include monuments and sites, inscriptions, edicts, tools, and weapons and cultural evidences.
What are the sources of erudition?
studying, studying, studying.
What are the important sources.of studying history?
Important sources for studying history include primary sources such as documents, artifacts, and records from the time period being studied, as well as secondary sources like scholarly books and articles that analyze and interpret historical events. Other valuable sources include oral histories, archaeological findings, and digital archives. Combining multiple sources allows historians to gain a comprehensive understanding of the past.
What are the main sources of history?
The main sources of history can be summarized by the following: * archaeological findings which reveal many aspects of history; * the writings of prior historians; * the writings of primary figures in history such as the works of Plato; and * studying oral history that was later placed in writing.
How are literary sources more useful than archaeological sources?
nhi pata mujhe>>!!
Distinguish between archaeological and literary sources?
Archaeological sources are physical objects or remains (such as artifacts, structures, and ancient tools) that provide evidence of past human societies, while literary sources are written texts that offer insights into historical events, beliefs, and traditions. Archaeological sources are tangible, while literary sources are more interpretive and can provide details on culture and societal norms not typically found in artifacts.
What are the sources for information on the ancient Hebrews?
old testament and archaeological questions
Debate on literary sources are more useful than archelogical sources for writing history?
literary sources are more useful than archaeological sources for writing history
What are the two archaeological sources in ancient Indian history?
the sources of modern history of India were the literary sources like manuscripts,scrolls , books ,important documents etc.;the second would be archaeological sources and monuments and the third would be other sources like printing machine,photographs,reports.radio broadcasts etc.
