Because many are performed in ignorance, through laziness and/or under poor or no supervision.
Due to Britain's continued conflicts with the French, English economy was in shambles. So they decided to earn some money from the colonies in the form of acts. These acts include the Stamp Act, Sugar Act, etc. But to answer your question more specifically, it was the Declaratory Act that granted the English Parliament full control of the colonies.
The British government wanted to do everything possible to control the trade the Colonists had with other countries. Passing the Navigation Acts limited the countries that the Colonists could trade with.
He helped make the Townshed acts. That's why it was called the TOWNSHED acts. That one was obvious, but it's the answer so here you go.
Well the church was it's own "person" back then. They were able to choose high ranked officials and the King had to often agree with them. The church was a big thing in medieval times. They would help the king some days and hurt him on others. So, all in all, yes it was hard for the king to get control of the church!
The British government imposed numerous acts on the colonists primarily to recover debts from the French and Indian War and to exert greater control over colonial trade. Measures like the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts aimed to raise revenue directly from the colonies and enforce British authority. Additionally, the acts were intended to establish a framework for governance and maintain order in the growing colonies, but they often fueled colonial resentment and resistance. This ultimately contributed to the growing desire for independence among the colonists.
when a police officer is directing traffic. When it is unsafe to do so.
Well, I believe the control group acts as a standard for comparison in an experiment because it does not change, so it can be compared to the variables that do change.
it was hard because they were so it was hard work
Leave it alone, unless it is in a place that is unsafe for people or the egg. If so, contact your nearest animal control agency.
that question hard so pls answer the question
that question hard so pls answer the question
If the accident happened due to an unsafe act, it may be the mistake of the man carrying out the job, so he himself might responsible for the accident. More likely, such unsafe acts were being performed all along and this time circumstances came together to create an accident. Because of the repetitive nature of the unsafe act, the responsibility is the supervisor's for failing to note and correct inappropriate activity, or failing to establish an environment where doing that unsafe act was unacceptable to the workforce. If the accident happened due to unsafe condition, it is the responsibility of the supervisor who is supervising the job.
C# provides the ability to write unsafe code. In unsafe code it is possible to declare and operate on pointers, to perform conversions between pointers and integral types, to take the address of variables, and so forth. In a sense, it is like writing C code within a C# program. Unsafe code must be clearly marked with the modifier unsafe, so developers cannot possibly use unsafe features accidentally. When CLR finds this unsafe modifier, the execution engine works to ensure that unsafe code cannot be executed in an untrusted environment.
Personally, I wouldn't try it. So it's domesticated. Gorillas are wild animals and should be treated as such. Good luck whatever your decision.
The control is used as a base for comparison. The experiment needs a base before one can measure any changes to it, so the control acts as that base. You don't want to change the base. Ever. EVER!
Unsafe drugs that are harmful to the mother is usually very harmful to the fetus so no.
It is very hard to control. You can't start your own neighborhood and it is hard to make friends and start families.