The British didn't treat them nicely, there were too many taxes for no reason, and they didn't have Independence.
Boston Massacrea riot in Boston (March 5, 1770) arising from the resentment of Boston colonists toward British troops quartered in the city, in which the troops fired on the mob and killed several persons.
The term "Lobsterbacks" was used by colonists to refer to British soldiers due to their distinctive red uniforms, which resembled the color of cooked lobster shells. This nickname reflected the colonists' disdain and resentment towards British rule and the military presence in the colonies. The term also served to dehumanize the soldiers, reinforcing the growing divide between the colonists and the British authorities during the lead-up to the American Revolution.
it was a massacre and a riot because the boys came and started to make fun of a British red coat and that is a British soldier. the
When the soldiers were keeping older they were attacked by colonists and the soldiers defened themselves by firing. So yes it was justified for the brittish. America did not deserve to wage war with Britain...
The Quartering Act, which originated in the British Parliament in colonial times, ordered American colonists to house and feed British soldiers. There were two versions of the act, in 1765 and 1774. Neither was popular and in fact, increasingly, the American colonists resented these laws and sought ways to circumvent them; most state legislatures did in fact ignore or refuse to comply with them. These acts contributed to the belief on the part of the colonists that a revolution was necessary, in order to become independent from unfair British laws.
A Boston Colonist that is very loyal to the king and/or the British soldiers. It is also a person that believes that the British will win and think that other colonists should not rebel or stand up for their independence.
They met by an assembled line across Bunker Hill!
Boston Massacrea riot in Boston (March 5, 1770) arising from the resentment of Boston colonists toward British troops quartered in the city, in which the troops fired on the mob and killed several persons.
The term "Lobsterbacks" was used by colonists to refer to British soldiers due to their distinctive red uniforms, which resembled the color of cooked lobster shells. This nickname reflected the colonists' disdain and resentment towards British rule and the military presence in the colonies. The term also served to dehumanize the soldiers, reinforcing the growing divide between the colonists and the British authorities during the lead-up to the American Revolution.
it was a massacre and a riot because the boys came and started to make fun of a British red coat and that is a British soldier. the
it was when the colonists were throwin snowballs nd some other items at the British soldier. den the British soldier attacked on of the colonist creatin a crowd of ppl agaisnt the british soldier. so the a small number of british troops came nd the used their guns nd shot five of the colonist. them it got a national name nd it was Boston massarce It pretty much started the way it said above. This started with the tax. The colonists didn't like to pay the tax that England (I think) was making. This started the hatred and the thoughts of independence. Colonists were calling soldiers names like "Bloody-Backs" and "Lobster-Backs," making fun of their clothes. One day, a colonist hated the soldiers so much, he threw a rock at him. The colonist started calling names. More soldiers came for back-up. More colonists came too. They started argueing and they started fighting.
They had to do with after the colonists dumped the tea into the Boston Harbor. The British put restrictions on the colonists called the Intolerable Acts. I THINK!! Don't take my word for it. I did this last year for social studies :)
Go study yourself you lazy
When the soldiers were keeping older they were attacked by colonists and the soldiers defened themselves by firing. So yes it was justified for the brittish. America did not deserve to wage war with Britain...
The Quartering Act, which originated in the British Parliament in colonial times, ordered American colonists to house and feed British soldiers. There were two versions of the act, in 1765 and 1774. Neither was popular and in fact, increasingly, the American colonists resented these laws and sought ways to circumvent them; most state legislatures did in fact ignore or refuse to comply with them. These acts contributed to the belief on the part of the colonists that a revolution was necessary, in order to become independent from unfair British laws.
I think you are confused because it was not up to the colonists to protect British rule. It was up to the British forces.
Quartering Act