fractures* divide the country into special interest groups, and the country needs to be united to succeed.
To kill King James, in order to prevent the publishing of the 1611 King James bible.
That is the true definition of a civil war, when those factions want to control a single government.
yes
he wanted freedom
The Articles of Confederation actually confirmed the weak, decentralized system of government already in operation.
James Madison was the author of Federalist 10. He wrote it because he did not want to see the United States tore apart by factions.
By population.
becoming the president!! becoming the president!!
Our founding fathers were against political parties, or "factions," but the American people have long proved their ability to bulldoze the constitution so i'm not surprised it is PLATO question BY Jasur Sheepshead Bay
James Madison wanted Congress to have the power to legislate on matters essential for the welfare of the nation, including regulating commerce, collecting taxes, and providing for the common defense. He believed that a strong federal government was necessary to maintain order and protect citizens' rights. Additionally, Madison emphasized the importance of checks and balances to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. Ultimately, his vision for Congress was one that could effectively respond to the needs of a growing and diverse nation.
James Madison envisioned a nation grounded in the principles of republicanism, emphasizing a balance of power and the protection of individual rights. He advocated for a strong federal government to maintain order and unity while also championing the importance of checks and balances to prevent tyranny. Madison believed in the necessity of a Bill of Rights to safeguard individual liberties, reflecting his commitment to both governance and personal freedoms. His direction for the country aimed to foster a stable, democratic society that respected both the rule of law and the rights of its citizens.
James Madison believed that allowing representatives to serve more than one term would promote stability and continuity in governance. He argued that experienced legislators could better understand and address the complexities of legislation and the needs of their constituents. Additionally, longer terms would encourage a deeper commitment to public service and help prevent frequent turnover that might disrupt effective governance. Madison's perspective reflected his understanding of the importance of both accountability and expertise in a functioning democracy.
James Madison advocated for Congress to adopt measures that would strengthen the federal government while balancing the powers between the states and national authority. He believed in a system that would prevent any one faction from dominating, promoting a republican form of governance that protected individual rights. Ultimately, Madison supported a framework that would enable Congress to effectively legislate for the common good while safeguarding against tyranny.
James Madison
James Madison sought to prepare against the dangerous vice of faction, which he viewed as groups that could pursue their own interests at the expense of the common good. He believed that factions could lead to instability and tyranny within a union, undermining democratic governance. To mitigate this risk, he advocated for a large republic where diverse interests would balance each other, preventing any single faction from dominating. This concept is prominently discussed in Federalist No. 10.
He wanted to preserve the federal union and prevent Civil War .
Oh, dude, you want adjectives for James Madison? Like, sure, I guess. Let's see... I'd say he was intelligent, influential, political, scholarly, reserved, articulate, strategic, diplomatic, visionary, and... oh, what's that word... oh yeah, short. Wait, is that too mean?