The Boston Massacre happened in 1770 and the Boston Tea Party happened in 1773.
The Boston Massacre took place in 1770 while the Coercive acts took place in 1774 4 years later.
The Boston Massacre occurred in 1770 during colonial times, while the Kent State Massacre took place in 1970 during the Vietnam War era. The Boston Massacre involved clashes between British soldiers and colonial civilians, resulting in the deaths of five colonists. On the other hand, the Kent State Massacre involved the shooting of four student protesters by the Ohio National Guard during an anti-war demonstration. The causes, context, and outcomes of the two events were different due to the significant time gap and varying historical circumstances.
Crispus Attucks - a black man who was the first person to be killed in the Boston Massacre. British soldiers were put on trial for the wrongful killings. The soldier who attacked Attucks was found not guilty while the other two soldiers who attacked other people killed and wounded were found guilty.
The Boston Massacre was important because it eventually lead to the Revolutionary war, and the revolution changed American history.because nobody knew who yelled "fire" the colonists or the capitain of the redcoats and they wanna knoe
The Boston Massacre happened in 1770 and the Boston Tea Party happened in 1773.
The Boston Massacre took place in 1770 while the Coercive acts took place in 1774 4 years later.
No in fact he was killed while loading a ship for sailing in the Boston Massacre.
The Boston Massacre occurred because the Bostonians were protesting the presence of the British Forces being in there, the Bostonians were throwing snowballs at them and throwing rocks at them. The British soldiers shot at them to make them stop, and in the aftermath 5 Bostonian colonists were killed while the others ran away.
The Boston Massacre occurred in 1770 during colonial times, while the Kent State Massacre took place in 1970 during the Vietnam War era. The Boston Massacre involved clashes between British soldiers and colonial civilians, resulting in the deaths of five colonists. On the other hand, the Kent State Massacre involved the shooting of four student protesters by the Ohio National Guard during an anti-war demonstration. The causes, context, and outcomes of the two events were different due to the significant time gap and varying historical circumstances.
The Townshend Act - The Boston tea party was December 6th, 1773 while the Townshend Act resulted in the Boston Massacre in 1770. On the same day as the massacre in Boston, Parliament began to consider a motion to repeal the Townshend Acts. Most of the new taxes were repealed, but the tax on tea remained.
well, the victims of the Boston Massacre were important because they were considered the first people to die for freedom, but one African American man killed was considered more important than the others because he was the first black man to die for his own independence, while the Boston massacre was made out to be a complete fault by the British, it was ruled that the British troops were taunted and asked to shoot at passerbys by the American Radicalists. So basically, we asked for it.
Crispus Attucks - a black man who was the first person to be killed in the Boston Massacre. British soldiers were put on trial for the wrongful killings. The soldier who attacked Attucks was found not guilty while the other two soldiers who attacked other people killed and wounded were found guilty.
The Boston Massacre was important because it eventually lead to the Revolutionary war, and the revolution changed American history.because nobody knew who yelled "fire" the colonists or the capitain of the redcoats and they wanna knoe
The Boston Massacre is one of most important events that turned colonial sentiment against King George III and British acts and taxes. Each of these events followed a pattern of Britain asserting its control, and the colonists chafing under the increased regulation. Events such as the Tea Act and the ensuing Boston Tea Party were further examples of the crumbling relationship between Britain and the colonies. While it took five years from the Massacre to outright revolution, it foreshadowed the violent rebellion to come. It also demonstrated how British authority galvanized colonial opposition and protest.
Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all
Conflicts between the British and the colonists had been on the rise because the British government had been trying to increase control over the colonies and raise taxes at the same time. The event in Boston helped to unite the colonies against Britain. What started as a minor fight became a turning point in the beginnings of the American Revolution. The Boston Massacre helped spark the colonists' desire for American independence, while the dead rioters became martyrs for liberty.