Different people are going to give different answers to that. One opinion: opponents of the New Deal wanted to maintain the status quo--that is, keep the rich rich and the poor poor.
As a leader, Leon Trotsky aimed to promote the idea of permanent revolution, advocating for continuous international proletarian uprisings to ensure the success of socialism globally. He sought to spread Marxist ideology beyond Russia, believing that a single nation could not sustain socialism in isolation. Trotsky also focused on building a strong Red Army and establishing a workers' state that would empower the proletariat against capitalist forces. Ultimately, he envisioned a united, revolutionary movement that would lead to a classless society.
the American socialist movement
Lenin's NEP never did lead to communism. In fact, the NEP was a controversial return to capitalism in the areas of agriculture and small businesses. In that respect, it was a retreat from socialism and the anticipated march toward communism. Lenin introduced it as a temporary measure to bolster a failing economy, which threatened to lead to another revolution which would have swept him and the Bolsheviks out of power for exactly the same reasons the Tsar and then the Provisional Government were swept out of power.
False.
Harriet Tubman delt with the people that didn't want to be lead to freedom by putting a BB gun to their head and threatn' to shoot em
yes
One primary criticism of socialism is that it can lead to inefficiencies and lack of innovation due to reduced incentives for individuals to work hard or take risks. Critics argue that central planning and government control can stifle economic growth and individual freedom.
Centrally-planned economies in the USSR and Eastern Bloc. Market socialism in Yugoslavia. State capitalism in modern day China and Vietnam.
It would have except the government cut back on cash infusions into the economy which lead to the second new deal
No, socialism is an economic system with specific economic models. It is not as much a political ideal as it is an economic system intended to lead to certain social outcomes.
Anagrams of 'lead' are deal and lade.
Some opponents of the New Deal believed that it gave too much power to the federal government and undermined individual liberty and free-market capitalism. They argued that the government should not intervene in the economy and that the New Deal's policies were too expensive and would lead to excessive government spending and debt. Some critics also accused President Roosevelt of overstepping his constitutional authority.
Engels wrote about socialism to promote the ideas of Karl Marx and to advocate for a society that operated on principles of equality, cooperation, and communal ownership of resources. He believed that socialism could lead to a more just and egalitarian society, free from exploitation and oppression. Engels saw socialism as a necessary response to the injustices and inequalities of industrial capitalism.
The metal is lead.
Democratic socialism is different from Communism in the political strategy and tactics used to achieve socialism. Democratic socialists believe the movement for socialism should be democratic, co-operative and spontaneous, without any elitist party or "Vanguard" directing its actions. Alternatively, democratic socialists use the existing democratic government to promote socialism. Communists, more appropriately known as Leninists or Marxist-Leninists, believe that a hierarchical organization called a "Vanguard party" is required to achieve socialism. The Vanguard party would control the movement, lead the revolution, and be composed by elite "professional revolutionaries". The justification for this authoritarian strategy is that a paramilitary organization is required to ensure the success of a socialist revolution.
Some critics argued that the New Deal was unconditional because it provided financial aid and support without requiring recipients to make significant changes in their circumstances or behaviors. They believed this approach fostered dependency on government assistance rather than encouraging self-sufficiency and personal responsibility. Additionally, some viewed the extensive government intervention in the economy as overreach, undermining free-market principles. Critics contended that such unconditional support could lead to long-term economic inefficiencies and moral hazards.
This very small piece of lead you can put in their brain