answersLogoWhite

0

Different people are going to give different answers to that. One opinion: opponents of the New Deal wanted to maintain the status quo--that is, keep the rich rich and the poor poor.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What did Trotsky want to achieve as a leader?

As a leader, Leon Trotsky aimed to promote the idea of permanent revolution, advocating for continuous international proletarian uprisings to ensure the success of socialism globally. He sought to spread Marxist ideology beyond Russia, believing that a single nation could not sustain socialism in isolation. Trotsky also focused on building a strong Red Army and establishing a workers' state that would empower the proletariat against capitalist forces. Ultimately, he envisioned a united, revolutionary movement that would lead to a classless society.


Which was an argument used by critics of the ERA to defeat ratification?

Critics of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) argued that it would undermine traditional family structures by erasing legal distinctions between men and women. They claimed it could lead to negative consequences, such as women being drafted into the military or losing alimony and child custody rights. Additionally, opponents feared that the ERA would eliminate protections specifically designed for women in the workplace, ultimately harming rather than helping their rights.


Who lead the American socialist movement?

the American socialist movement


What was the result of Lenin's new economic policy?

Lenin's NEP never did lead to communism. In fact, the NEP was a controversial return to capitalism in the areas of agriculture and small businesses. In that respect, it was a retreat from socialism and the anticipated march toward communism. Lenin introduced it as a temporary measure to bolster a failing economy, which threatened to lead to another revolution which would have swept him and the Bolsheviks out of power for exactly the same reasons the Tsar and then the Provisional Government were swept out of power.


Did Roosevelt's New Deal program lead to greater progress in the construction industry than that of pre great depression levels?

False.

Related Questions

Who said that socialism means slavery?

The phrase "socialism means slavery" is often attributed to U.S. President Woodrow Wilson, who expressed concerns about the implications of socialism on individual freedom. This sentiment has been echoed by various political figures and critics of socialism throughout history, emphasizing the belief that increased government control over the economy and personal choices can lead to a loss of personal liberties. The concept has been a point of contention in political discourse, particularly in debates about the role of government in economic systems.


Does Government welfare and entitlements lead to socialism?

yes


What is the primary criticism made of socialism?

One primary criticism of socialism is that it can lead to inefficiencies and lack of innovation due to reduced incentives for individuals to work hard or take risks. Critics argue that central planning and government control can stifle economic growth and individual freedom.


Which economic system did socialism lead to?

Centrally-planned economies in the USSR and Eastern Bloc. Market socialism in Yugoslavia. State capitalism in modern day China and Vietnam.


Did the new deal bring an end to the depression?

It would have except the government cut back on cash infusions into the economy which lead to the second new deal


Is socialism a core political ideal?

No, socialism is an economic system with specific economic models. It is not as much a political ideal as it is an economic system intended to lead to certain social outcomes.


What are the anagrams of lead?

Anagrams of 'lead' are deal and lade.


What did some opponents of the new deal believe?

Some opponents of the New Deal believed that it gave too much power to the federal government and undermined individual liberty and free-market capitalism. They argued that the government should not intervene in the economy and that the New Deal's policies were too expensive and would lead to excessive government spending and debt. Some critics also accused President Roosevelt of overstepping his constitutional authority.


Why did Engels write about Socialism?

Engels wrote about socialism to promote the ideas of Karl Marx and to advocate for a society that operated on principles of equality, cooperation, and communal ownership of resources. He believed that socialism could lead to a more just and egalitarian society, free from exploitation and oppression. Engels saw socialism as a necessary response to the injustices and inequalities of industrial capitalism.


What metal is deal when it is unscramble?

The metal is lead.


How is demorcratic socialism politically different from communism?

Democratic socialism is different from Communism in the political strategy and tactics used to achieve socialism. Democratic socialists believe the movement for socialism should be democratic, co-operative and spontaneous, without any elitist party or "Vanguard" directing its actions. Alternatively, democratic socialists use the existing democratic government to promote socialism. Communists, more appropriately known as Leninists or Marxist-Leninists, believe that a hierarchical organization called a "Vanguard party" is required to achieve socialism. The Vanguard party would control the movement, lead the revolution, and be composed by elite "professional revolutionaries". The justification for this authoritarian strategy is that a paramilitary organization is required to ensure the success of a socialist revolution.


Why did some criticize the New Deal as unconditional?

Some critics argued that the New Deal was unconditional because it provided financial aid and support without requiring recipients to make significant changes in their circumstances or behaviors. They believed this approach fostered dependency on government assistance rather than encouraging self-sufficiency and personal responsibility. Additionally, some viewed the extensive government intervention in the economy as overreach, undermining free-market principles. Critics contended that such unconditional support could lead to long-term economic inefficiencies and moral hazards.