The Founders universally opposed democracy--we are a Republic, not a Democracy, which means, by definition, that we have a representative form of government not a direct vote. Alexander Hamilton said that "democracy was the surest path to tyranny".
The framers of the constitution leaned toward a Republican system of government. They felt that a republic led to indirect authority where people can elect political figures to make some decisions for them instead of all of them.
german prefer the use of migrant labour because of the way of adiministration she used in her colonies which is direct rule,direct rule associated with the opening of plantation which require constant supply of labour.therefore migrant labour was seen as the better solution.
The past tense of prefer is preferred.
The people in Canada prefer the term First Nations. In the United States, some prefer American Indian and some prefer native Anmerica and some prefer the name of their tribal group. For example, many Navajo say: I'm not Indian, I'm Navajo or I'm Dine'.
monarchy
The concept of government that the framers favored was the republic form. This was the form of government that would allow the people to appoint those they wanted to represent them into government positions.
Because you're an idiot. Or you live in a place small enough and with few enough issues for it to be practical. Direct democracy rapidly becomes unwieldy for any government much larger than a small town.
Strawberries prefer to grow in direct sunlight rather than in shade.
because the republicanism is better than pure democracy
The theoretical advantages of direct democracy are quite appealing:Dramatic reduction or elimination of the power of political parties.Reduction of the influence of special interests (corporations and labor unions).Reduction of political "horse-trading" and "pork-barrel" deals.As a result, someone who belongs to a majority group would prefer pure democracy. However, there are several weaknesses of direct democracy:There is no incentive to protect minority rights, property rights or personal liberty ("tyranny of the majority"). This is sometimes summarized by the aphorism (misattributed to Benjamin Franklin), "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch".The public is frequently ill-informed on complex issues.Public opinion is easily manipulated by the media.The public is susceptible to popular delusions ("the madness of crowds").Public opinion is unduly influenced by recent events and ignorant of the lessons of history.The near-term self-interests of the public, even though they may form a majority, may be contrary to the long-term best interest of the population as a whole (similar to the "tragedy of the commons"). Some would argue that this is true of representative democracy, as well.
The framers of the constitution leaned toward a Republican system of government. They felt that a republic led to indirect authority where people can elect political figures to make some decisions for them instead of all of them.
Yes. In fact all prefer bright but not direct light, except Earth Star and Pineapple Dyckia, which both prefer bright direct sun.
Peace lilies prefer shade rather than direct sunlight. They thrive in indirect light and can be harmed by too much sun exposure.
Mostly. The people in a party pick their candidate, and the people of the nation pick which candidate they prefer. Of course strictly speaking we don't live in a democracy, we live in a republic - in a direct democracy every citizen votes on policy and takes turns serving as legislative, executive, and judicial figures (a la Athens in ancient greece). Of course that doesn't scale up very well, and a republic is an acceptable alternative.
Peace lilies do not thrive in direct sunlight. They prefer bright, indirect light to grow well.
In my opinion I prefer the free market economy.Because we live in a capitalistic democracy, I have grown accustomed to the market economy.I much prefer a market economy over a planned economy.
They prefer to not be in direct sunlight.