answersLogoWhite

0

They had the senate in charge

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What branch of government in ancient rome that had unlimited power called a dictator?

The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.


Why were so many Romans willing to accept a dictator?

Twenty years of civil war meant many Romans were willing to accept a dictator


What did the Romans might have felt about living in a dictatorship?

The Romans never lived in a dictatorship. The word dictator had a different meaning for the Romans. He was an extraordinary officer of state appointed for a term of six months during an emergency.


What did Julius Caesar do that was bad for Rome?

If Ceasar had ruled as "dictator for life", the senate would have lost their power; Rome would no longer be a democracy. Furthermore, the last dictator they had before Ceasar was the cruel King Tarquin, who ruled 450 years earlier. The thought of another dictator scared many Romans. =D


Who was the best-known roman dictatator was appointed by the senate in a time of great what?

A dictator was appointed by the senate in the times of a crises. He had supreme power and was expected to resign his dictatorship as soon as the problem was solved. To us, the best known dictator was Julius Caesar. To the Romans the best known dictator was Cinncinatus in the positive sense, and Sulla in the negative sense.

Related Questions

What is an absolute ruler that Romans appointed to deal with a crisis?

dictator


What branch of government in ancient rome that had unlimited power called a dictator?

The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.The Romans had no branch of government called a dictator. A dictator was a person with unlimited power appointed by the senate under the republican form of government.


Why were many Romans willing to accept a dictator?

Twenty years of civil war meant many Romans were willing to accept a dictator


Why were so many Romans willing to accept a dictator?

Twenty years of civil war meant many Romans were willing to accept a dictator


Who was elected dictator for life by the Romans?

Julius Caesar


When did the Romans appoint a director and for how long?

I think you mean Dictator. The Romans would appoint a dictator only in times of crisis and when the problem was solved, the Dictator was expected to step down from his office. However, five years was usually the maximum amount of time. that the senate would give out to a Dictator. Julius Caesar was the exception.


What could the Romans do appoint in times of emergencys?

Under the republic, the Romans could appoint a dictator in times of emergencies.


When did the early Romans appoint dictators?

The first dictator was appointed in 490BC


What did the Romans might have felt about living in a dictatorship?

The Romans never lived in a dictatorship. The word dictator had a different meaning for the Romans. He was an extraordinary officer of state appointed for a term of six months during an emergency.


What was unusual about the office of roman dictator?

The Roman office of dictator was unusual by the fact that it was a delegation of supreme power to one man. The reason that the Romans established the republic in the first place was to avoid rule by a single person and the appointment of a dictator seemed to contradict this principle.


What did Julius Caesar do that was bad for Rome?

If Ceasar had ruled as "dictator for life", the senate would have lost their power; Rome would no longer be a democracy. Furthermore, the last dictator they had before Ceasar was the cruel King Tarquin, who ruled 450 years earlier. The thought of another dictator scared many Romans. =D


What form of government did the Romans follow before Caesar became dictator in 46 bc?

They didnt follow any form of government all they did was have sex