answersLogoWhite

0

The anti-war movement of the 1960s and 1970s opposed interventionalism primarily due to a belief in the principle of self-determination for nations, arguing that foreign interventions often led to prolonged conflicts and suffering. Critics highlighted the moral and ethical implications of military involvement, asserting that it frequently resulted in civilian casualties and destabilization. Additionally, many activists felt that interventionalism was a reflection of imperialistic tendencies, undermining global peace and sovereignty. This opposition was driven by a desire for diplomacy and peaceful resolution over military action.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago

What else can I help you with?