They didnt want to pay taxes on their tea and items. They didnt want to be ruled by the king.
~wiki answers official
Yes, Gandhi did encourage Indians to NOT buy British goods because it was too expensive in the olden days when India was under the British rule.
Gandhi encouraged the Indian populace to stop buying British goods through the promotion of swadeshi, which emphasized the use of locally made products. He organized boycotts of British textiles and goods, urging people to spin their own cloth (khadi) as a symbol of self-reliance and resistance. By appealing to national pride and highlighting the economic impact of British colonialism, he inspired widespread participation in these boycotts as a form of nonviolent protest against British rule.
Another way instead of the Boston Tea Party that colonists might have done to protest the Tea Act was not buying the British tea. If many colonists didn't buy tea from Britain or just stop drinking it then the British wouldn't be making a profit from that sale and this would anger them because they need money. Maybe the British would lower the prices or make a compromise with the colonies.
The colonists responded to the Townshend Acts with strong opposition and organized resistance. They implemented a boycott of British goods, urging merchants to stop importing items subject to the new taxes. Additionally, groups like the Sons of Liberty emerged to protest and coordinate actions against British authorities. Tensions escalated, ultimately contributing to events like the Boston Massacre in 1770.
The British said they would stop colonists from settling in the west
They would stop trade with all british. They destroyed british goods in the colonies. They basically rebeled.Vowed to not imprt British goods.
They would stop buying sugar , molasses, and other sweetened goods.
The British government tried to stop American colonists from smuggling with the Sugar Act.
Yes, Gandhi did encourage Indians to NOT buy British goods because it was too expensive in the olden days when India was under the British rule.
Boycott
boycott
Gandhi encouraged the Indian populace to stop buying British goods through the promotion of swadeshi, which emphasized the use of locally made products. He organized boycotts of British textiles and goods, urging people to spin their own cloth (khadi) as a symbol of self-reliance and resistance. By appealing to national pride and highlighting the economic impact of British colonialism, he inspired widespread participation in these boycotts as a form of nonviolent protest against British rule.
Boycott
Embargo
No they can't.
Another way instead of the Boston Tea Party that colonists might have done to protest the Tea Act was not buying the British tea. If many colonists didn't buy tea from Britain or just stop drinking it then the British wouldn't be making a profit from that sale and this would anger them because they need money. Maybe the British would lower the prices or make a compromise with the colonies.
because the british got fed up with the colinest and yeah bynote from new answerer: the British DID NOT get fed up with the Colonists. The colonists got fed up with the british. Because of said reasons belowNew Answer: February 11, 20091.) Because the British kept giving taxes to the Colonists. They treated the Colonists like a "money tree". So everytime the British needed money, they just took some from the Colonists.2.) Colonists began smuggling in sugar3.) The British had the Stamp Act and the Sugar Act.STAMP ACT = every written document now had a taxSUGAR ACT = this was to stop colonists from smuggling goods (mostly and other foods)4.) Eventually, the Colonists got really pissed off.