Most likely because they believe that if you are going to have someone make laws for your country that they should be born in that specific state to have a better understanding of everything, and be more familiar with it. Because it wouldn't make much sense to have someone from another State to go to a different one and start making laws.
No
How leaders where chosen in ancient Egypt is that they would make the last king's first son, or sometimes first daughter rule over Egypt. Then when they died there first son or daughter would be the leader.
It led Portuguese leaders to leave Europe and rule from the colony of Brazil.
The Nazi leaders claimed a divine right to rule over all the other races. This divine right came directly from God and is not to be questioned or challenged.
They were afraid that they would fall under German rule, so their changes to the government allowed their president to veto any bills that let them susceptible to German rule.
Cuba is a Communist Dictatorship - the government leaders MAKE the laws.
He didn't rule it. In America, we do not have a king or a queen, so we do not say our President "rules" our country. Our leaders are "elected" by the voters. So, if you are asking when he was elected as the leader of our country, Barack Obama became president in 2008, and then was re-elected in 2012.
do the government leaders of each country follow the rule of law
Dictatorship
Bihar and Karnataka are under President's rule.
Thus far, no President of the United States was not born in America. Of course, the first six were born under British colonial rule, before the United States existed as an independent country,
no
Eat but
No
Not in most cases. If both parents are Americans, the case has not been positively settled in the courts. As a rule, the President must be a native born citizen.
Exactly
How leaders where chosen in ancient Egypt is that they would make the last king's first son, or sometimes first daughter rule over Egypt. Then when they died there first son or daughter would be the leader.