Nobles were against the creation of guilds and allowing serfs to pay with goods rather than labor.
Kings than nobles than the polititiand and soldiers than the woman than the poor
During the Middle Ages, the upper class consisted of royalty and the nobles. Originally, kings and nobles had emerged out of the chaos left after the passing of the Roman Empire, having carved out for themselves a piece of land and there become established. Gradually, most monarchies were maintained by hereditary lineage, and nobles were entitled to their status in latter generations simply by virtue of being born in a noble family. With such status went great land claims and material wealth. The idea was that the king would maintenance the land, making it safe and profitable for those who sought to live under his rule and protection while the nobles would serve to support the king in such endeavors as well as being his fighting and diplomatic force. Power corrupts and kings and nobles sometimes failed in their responsibilities, succumbing perhaps to greed or brutality. Kings eventually became so mistrusting of their own nobles and their ambitions that they decreed that all nobles must attend the king at court and leave their own lands to be maintained by family and servants. This proved catastrophic since the nobles often lost touch with the people they lorded over and so made bad decisions towards their welfare and the stability of their own positions as well as the kingdom. A good noble, however, was a very powerful and just man who was trained in chivalry and letters and who sought to uphold his word before God and men.
No. Nobles were kings so that makes your question false.
During the Middle Ages, kings often rewarded their favorite nobles with land grants, known as fiefs, which provided them with income and power. They might also bestow titles of nobility, privileges, or key positions in the royal court or military. In addition, kings sometimes granted their favored nobles the right to collect taxes from certain regions, further enhancing their wealth and influence. These rewards helped to secure loyalty and maintain a stable hierarchy within the feudal system.
Not very good Medieval life even for the king was not all about the pomp & grandeur, if you were a king you had the constant struggle of maintaining power over the lords middle class.
They didn't have a middle class in the middle ages. There were some scribes and lawyers, but much of the offical work done was by other nobles who were part of the court.
Kings and Popes... I believe. (:
The highest group are lords, of kings. Then under the come vassals, or lesser lords. Finally there were serf, which are peasants that are bound to the land.
priests and nobles
the kings and nobles would eat suger.
Kings than nobles than the polititiand and soldiers than the woman than the poor
the middle class was the freetowners, it goes POPE KING NOBLES KNIGHTS FREETOWNERS PEASANTS SERFS The Middle Class rose during the Middle Ages in Europe for a variety of reasons. First of these reasons is that the workers became richer in the aftermath of the Black Death. Secondly, education in Europe was greatly improved with the invention of the Printing Press. Thirdly, the formation of banking greatly improved the economy in favour of the Middle Class. Lastly, the formation of medieval republics benefited the Middle Class. The Middle class consisted of Freetowners, people below the knights and nobles but above peasants and serfs... https://sites.google.com/site/seniorschoolstudy/history/rise-of-the-middle-class---middle-ages
The Sumerian class system consists of three layers. The first layer, or upper layer is were the kings,priests, and nobles reside. The second layer, also known as the middle layer, has the less fortunate people, such as the merchants, artisans, and traders. The lower class holds all of the slaves.
During the Middle Ages, the upper class consisted of royalty and the nobles. Originally, kings and nobles had emerged out of the chaos left after the passing of the Roman Empire, having carved out for themselves a piece of land and there become established. Gradually, most monarchies were maintained by hereditary lineage, and nobles were entitled to their status in latter generations simply by virtue of being born in a noble family. With such status went great land claims and material wealth. The idea was that the king would maintenance the land, making it safe and profitable for those who sought to live under his rule and protection while the nobles would serve to support the king in such endeavors as well as being his fighting and diplomatic force. Power corrupts and kings and nobles sometimes failed in their responsibilities, succumbing perhaps to greed or brutality. Kings eventually became so mistrusting of their own nobles and their ambitions that they decreed that all nobles must attend the king at court and leave their own lands to be maintained by family and servants. This proved catastrophic since the nobles often lost touch with the people they lorded over and so made bad decisions towards their welfare and the stability of their own positions as well as the kingdom. A good noble, however, was a very powerful and just man who was trained in chivalry and letters and who sought to uphold his word before God and men.
Kings
They help the kings...
Kings got nobles to support them by giving or promising something, usually land.