answersLogoWhite

0

Upon returning from war, many of the veterans had accumulated enough money to move into the urban areas. This caused the sale of farmland to aristocrats who began building large farmsteads similar to plantations. These large farms grew cash crops such as olives and grapes. This caused the Italian Peninsula to import gains to feed the citizens. Rome began buying grain and selling it at a reduced price to its urban citizens who were not able to grow sustenance crops. This measure helped but many of Rome's poor were still unable to feed themselves. To solve this issue and gain favor among the plebeians, a new program was instituted providing free grain to starving Romans.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

How did roman Emperors maintain control over the plebeians?

The Roman emperors did not have to "control" the plebeians in any way. By the time of the emperors, the plebeians were the nobility along with the patricians and had just as much to lose or gain through politics. The "bread and circus" routine at certain times of the year satisfied the poorer masses. This consisted of free food, free entertainment, and gifts of money.


How were the emperors after Marcus Aurelius corrupt?

After Marcus Aurelius, many Roman emperors exhibited corruption through various means, including nepotism, bribery, and misuse of power. They often prioritized personal gain over the welfare of the empire, leading to financial mismanagement and increased taxation. Emperors like Commodus, who succeeded Aurelius, indulged in extravagance and self-indulgence, further eroding the integrity of the office. This decline in moral leadership contributed to instability and the eventual crisis of the third century.


Why did the emperors organize the gladaitor fights?

Emperors organized gladiator fights primarily to entertain the Roman populace and gain their favor, showcasing their power and generosity. These spectacles served as a means of political propaganda, distracting citizens from social issues and reinforcing the emperor's status. Additionally, the games were a way to demonstrate military prowess, as gladiatorial combat often mirrored the battles faced in war. Overall, they were a strategic tool for maintaining control over the masses.


What allies who fought in the punic Wars rebelled to gain the rights?

roman allies in the punic wars rebelled to gain the rights of


How did most of the emperors gain power between ad180 and 284?

Between AD 180 and 284, most Roman emperors gained power primarily through military support, as the period was marked by political instability and frequent coups. Generals often seized the throne by leading their troops against the current emperor, leveraging their military might to claim legitimacy. Additionally, some emperors were elevated by the Senate or popular acclaim, but these instances were less common during the prevalent crisis of the third century. The constant power struggles and civil wars contributed to a cycle of rapid succession and instability in leadership.

Related Questions

How did roman Emperors maintain control over the plebeians?

The Roman emperors did not have to "control" the plebeians in any way. By the time of the emperors, the plebeians were the nobility along with the patricians and had just as much to lose or gain through politics. The "bread and circus" routine at certain times of the year satisfied the poorer masses. This consisted of free food, free entertainment, and gifts of money.


Did emperors pay for bloody fights in the Roman Colosseum to gain popularity?

Yes


How could an enslaved person gain freedom?

In Roman times the slave owner could free them.


What happened to the roman republic?

When Brutus killed Julius Caesar, the Roman Republic dissolved into a civil war. Octavius became Emperor, and restored order. Some features of the republic lasted for a number of years, but the Emperors continued to gain power.


How did the Roman Senate gain power?

During the period of the republic the senate was a very powerful body, but it never gained power. It was an advisory body, not a ruling body. During the period of rule by emperors the senate was reduced to a rubber stamp body for the policies of the emperors.


How did the ambitions of German emperors affect the Holy Roman Empire?

as the holy roman empire furthered itself, the ambitions of German emperors became greater. However they had so much ambition, but were not successful because the pope 3wanted to gain power over them.


Can Roman slaves allowed to vote?

No, Roman slaves were not allowed to vote. Voting rights were primarily reserved for Roman citizens who were free men. Slaves were considered property and did not have the same legal rights as free citizens.


How did the Inca and the Aztec emperors gain power?

by taking over city states and helping make better weapons


What allies who fought in the punic Wars rebelled to gain the rights?

roman allies in the punic wars rebelled to gain the rights of


Plebeians gain larger role in roman republic?

Yes, progressively.


What is the password for faceparty this week?

Since not all of FaceParty is free for use, WikiAnswers cannot provide you with passwords to gain subscription-level access to FaceParty. This is receiving something for free that you should be paying for, which is technically theft. Thus, it is the reason why we will not provide this information nor allow it to be available here - it's basically illegal.


How did most of the emperors gain power between ad180 and 284?

Between AD 180 and 284, most Roman emperors gained power primarily through military support, as the period was marked by political instability and frequent coups. Generals often seized the throne by leading their troops against the current emperor, leveraging their military might to claim legitimacy. Additionally, some emperors were elevated by the Senate or popular acclaim, but these instances were less common during the prevalent crisis of the third century. The constant power struggles and civil wars contributed to a cycle of rapid succession and instability in leadership.