0
What else can I help you with?
What was the cause the civil rights act of 1870?
The Civil Rights Act of 1870 was primarily driven by the need to protect the rights of newly freed African Americans following the Civil War and the abolition of slavery. It aimed to combat racial discrimination by affirming the right to vote and ensuring equal protection under the law. The act was a response to the widespread violence and intimidation faced by Black citizens, particularly in the Southern states, and sought to enforce the provisions of the 14th and 15th Amendments. Ultimately, it reflected the federal government's commitment to civil rights during the Reconstruction era.
Truman did enough to promote civil rights?
No. If he had there would have not been a need for the 1964 civil rights act.
Which founding father would most likely oppose the patriot act?
James Madison, often referred to as the "Father of the Constitution," would most likely oppose the Patriot Act due to his strong belief in civil liberties and individual rights. He was a proponent of the Bill of Rights, emphasizing the need to protect citizens from government overreach. Madison's commitment to limited government and the protection of personal freedoms suggests he would be critical of any legislation that undermines privacy and due process.
Why do some individual rights need special protection in the constitution?
To protect the rights and freedoms of certain individuals and groups to ensure equality.
How is martin king jr's famous speech related to the universal declaration of human rights?
both addressed the need for civil rights
What ideas for government did Thomas Jefferson stress in his inaugural address?
He stressed for the need of a limited government and the protection of civil liberties.
Why do you need civil law?
They are our rights. Like our right to live! We need the Civil Law because , I want my rights!
Truman did enough to promote civil rights?
No. If he had there would have not been a need for the 1964 civil rights act.
Do human rights need more protection in the United Kingdom?
human rights there is no point of them
What are some civil rights?
Some rights are as following:1) Freedom of speech2) Freedom of religionWhat are my civil rights? Here are some important civil rights that you need to know:rights to freedom of speech, religion, and assemblyright to be protected from unreasonable search and seizure of their homes and propertiesright to be protected against abuse of government authority in a legal procedurerights to a speedy and public trial, trial by a jury, and a right to counselright to be protected against federal government abuse in the form of excessive bail, excessive fines, cruel and unusual punishments
What does civil rights are relative not absolute mean?
Civil rights are not a absolute guarantee to all and need to be protected. Once lost they have to be fought for once again.
In what ways are Hobbes and Locke similar?
Hobbes and Locke both believed in the social contract theory, which states that individuals give up some freedoms in exchange for protection and order from the government. They also both emphasized the importance of individual rights and the need for a government to protect those rights.
What is the relationship of the following civil rights civil liberties hyperpluralism and diversity?
People will need to know what the following civil rights liberties are to know what the relationship is. Not knowing this information makes it hard to know what the relationship is.
What are the rights provided by same-sex civil unions?
The rights, privileges, and responsibilities of civil unions differ greatly from state to state and country to country. You need to check a particular jurisdiction. Generally, legal rights under a civil union do not nearly approach the rights bestowed by marriage.
What is a civil libertarian?
It is unclear where or how the term 'civil libertarian' actually came about. The term is mostly used by people who are attempting to describe other peoples politics of which they do not understand. Google Wikipedia's article on civil libertarian as an example of the confusion that comes from this word. The description of civil libertarianism describes people from both the left and the right. The biggest problem with the word is that civil rights are not natural rights. To be civil is to be a part of the state, but one need not the state in order to have natural rights, but one can not have civil rights with out the state. Who ever these 'civil libertarians' are they are not Libertarians, or members of the patriot community, or free thinking individuals. The belief that mans rights preexist a government is not a 'civil libertarian' ideology it is the ideology of freedom. It seems to me that these so called civil libertarians spend more time asking the government for liberties then they do just being free. I've heard it said that if only the leaders would lead, the people would surely follow. I'm inclined to believe that if you have no leaders all that's left is to follow your heart. I'm fairly certain that's legal. I don't need a plethora of civil libertarians playing politics with a government hell bent on reigning in the rights of the people, in order to be free. We would all be better off if we would mind our business then there would be far less confusion on what a civil libertarian is.
How did black codes help bring passage of civil rights act of 1866?
Black codes were restrictive laws enacted in Southern states after the Civil War that aimed to limit the rights and freedoms of newly freed African Americans. These laws highlighted the need for federal intervention to protect the civil rights of all citizens, as they perpetuated racial discrimination and inequality. The blatant injustices and inequalities enforced by the black codes galvanized public opinion and political support for the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which aimed to ensure equality and safeguard the rights of African Americans. Ultimately, the black codes served as a catalyst for the federal government's commitment to civil rights legislation.
Why does a country need government?
without a government a country would not be control and managed
