Historians disagree about what happened at Dunkirk due to differing interpretations of the strategic decisions made by military leaders, the effectiveness of the evacuation operation, and the broader implications for the war. Some view it as a miraculous evacuation that saved the British Army, while others see it as a retreat that showcased Allied failures. Additionally, the availability of primary sources and the perspectives of different historians contribute to varying narratives, leading to ongoing debates about the significance and consequences of the event.
aes
It happened at Dunkirk when the french were so badly injured they retreated.
the historians use graphs to something that happened over . unicorns are fluffy.
Please have a look at the two related questions below.
No - the evacuation at Dunkirk happened late May/early June 1940. The US didn't become involved in World War II until December 1941
aes
i don't kow can you tell me
I think the Maginot line was entirely staffed by the French. It was. Before the British retreated to Dunkirk, the Maginot Line had already fallen.
this question isunansweredthis question is answered
The atomic bomb was detonated (created) in 1945. That is what caused the cold war. Historians can disagree or Historians can agree; it has no bearing on the detonation date.
Historians never disagree they give an opinion and support it there is no right or wrong answer in an opinion!
it got completely wiped out by bombs
You make the mistake of assuming historians agree on everything. They don't, plain and simple. Historians agree on the obvious facts but disagree on the explanations of the grey areas.
It happened at Dunkirk when the french were so badly injured they retreated.
the historians use graphs to something that happened over . unicorns are fluffy.
Please have a look at the two related questions below.
No - the evacuation at Dunkirk happened late May/early June 1940. The US didn't become involved in World War II until December 1941