Lee equates secession with revolution because both involve a fundamental break from an established authority and the rejection of existing governance. Secession, like revolution, seeks to create a new political order by asserting the right to self-determination and independence. This perspective highlights the radical nature of secessionist movements, which often challenge the legitimacy of the state from which they are breaking away, similar to revolutionary actions aimed at overthrowing a government. Thus, both concepts share themes of resistance, transformation, and the pursuit of new political identities.
Because he sees no validity in the Southern cause(:
Because he disapproved of secession.
Because he disapproved of secession, but he was passionately concerned with the fortunes of his home-state of Virginia.
In his letter to his son, Robert E. Lee argues against secession by emphasizing the importance of loyalty to the Union and the potential consequences of division. He expresses his deep commitment to the United States, suggesting that the nation's strength lies in its unity. Lee acknowledges the grievances of the Southern states but believes that working within the framework of the Union is a more honorable and effective path than breaking away. Ultimately, he sees secession as detrimental to both the nation and the principles of democracy.
The Confederacy (South) He did not approve of secession, but felt he ought to go with his state (Virginia) when it eventually voted Confederate.
Because he sees no validity in the Southern cause(:
Lincoln viewed secession as a constitutional crisis that threatened the Union, believing that states did not have the right to unilaterally withdraw from it. Conversely, Robert E. Lee recognized secession as a states' right but regarded it as an act of anarchy that undermined the nation’s unity. While both men acknowledged the concept of states' rights, their interpretations led them to fundamentally different conclusions about the legitimacy and consequences of secession.
he hated it
Lee and Lincoln both felt that secession would damage the country, and allthough there were many contrasting points of view in the nation at the time, they felt that it would be a bad idea to permit any secession.
In the context of a complete revolution, which is 360 degrees, 2/9 of a revolution would equate to 80 degrees.
Because he disapproved of secession.
That slavery was a bad thing, and secession was a bad thing.
A term used for people who opposed secession of the states were called conservatives. The people that supported secession were called secessionists.
When a state left the Union it was called secession.
Robert E. Lee
Yes, Robert E. Lee favored secession to some extent, as he believed in the rights of states to govern themselves. However, his primary loyalty was to Virginia, his home state, and he initially opposed secession until it became clear that Virginia would join the Confederacy. Lee's complex views reflected a deep sense of duty to his state and a belief in the Southern cause, despite his personal ambivalence about slavery and the broader implications of the Civil War.
Because he disapproved of secession, but he was passionately concerned with the fortunes of his home-state of Virginia.