answersLogoWhite

0

The issue of long-term effects of the Chernobyl disaster on civilians is very controversial because when the disaster happened they had to be evacuated. The area don't present dangers but getting back or living there with no job.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How many square miles where contaminated in Chernobyl?

Approximately 2,600 square kilometers (1,000 square miles) were heavily contaminated with radioactive fallout after the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. This area is still considered unsafe for human habitation and is known as the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone.


Is hiroshima still radioactive today?

Some areas in Hiroshima still have low levels of radiation, but they are generally safe for visitors. The majority of the city has been decontaminated and is considered safe for human habitation and tourism.


What is the landscape of Antarctica?

It is a very cold and dry landscape and is not suitable for long-term human habitation. Ninety-eight percent of the continent is covered with an ice sheet.


What lanforms of the region made it an especially desirable place for human habitation?

The region's fertile lands, abundant water sources such as rivers and lakes, and mild climate made it an especially desirable place for human habitation. These geographical features provided food security, access to water for drinking and irrigation, and a suitable environment for agriculture and settlement.


What was the fallout radius of Chernobyl?

The fallout radius of the Chernobyl disaster varied depending on wind patterns and precipitation at the time of the accident. However, significant radioactive contamination was detected up to 1,000 kilometers (about 620 miles) from the reactor site. The most severely affected areas were within a 30-kilometer radius, designated as the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, where long-term human habitation is restricted due to high radiation levels.


How does human habitation effect ecosystems?

bad for birds and that


Why did people live in caves?

People lived in caves in the past for various reasons. Caves provided natural shelter from the elements, protection from predators, and were readily available in many environments. They also offered privacy and security for early human populations. Additionally, caves had a relatively constant temperature, which made them suitable for human habitation.


How many percent of land are habitable in US?

Roughly 47% of the land in the United States is considered habitable, meaning suitable for human habitation and development. This includes areas with housing, infrastructure, and amenities that support human life and activity.


What percentage of land is available for living and agriculture?

Approximately 37% of the Earth's land area is used for agriculture, while around 10% of the Earth's land area is considered suitable for human habitation.


Who was to blame at the Nuclear Meltdown at Chernobyl?

Human stupidity


Why were condition's in Africa suitable for humans to live in?

Conditions in Africa were suitable for human habitation due to the varied geography, abundant natural resources, and favorable climate for agriculture. The presence of rivers like the Nile provided water for irrigation and transport, while the diverse ecosystems offered a range of food sources. Additionally, the temperate climate in many regions allowed for year-round habitation and the development of complex societies.


Is there another planet which you can live on?

Currently, Earth is the only planet known to support life as we know it. Although scientists continue to search for habitable exoplanets, none have been confirmed to be suitable for human habitation.