Its a matter of opinion, so it isnt neccesarily better or worse.
However, it did have good soil and climate, liberal provisions in its constitution, and religious freedom.
it was the first to ratify the bill of rights
It isn't you over opinionated weiners.
New englanders exhibited the widest range of social diversity
The middle colonies consisted of the states of Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware. They were some of the most ethnically diverse of all areas and considered to more tolerant of mixed beliefs than the other colonies.
The dutch region of New York and Pennsylvania was near New Jersey and that region particularly was even stricter than other colonies in African slave labor. In short, yes they had slave labor.
it was the first to ratify the bill of rights
new york was better than the other colonies because people from Europe were entering new york and also new york had the biggest port in 13 colonies
It isn't you over opinionated weiners.
it was better because it had lots of wetland, which made it have awesome farmland.
New englanders exhibited the widest range of social diversity
it was better because it had lots of wetland, which made it have awesome farmland.
The middle colonies consisted of the states of Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey, and Delaware. They were some of the most ethnically diverse of all areas and considered to more tolerant of mixed beliefs than the other colonies.
The dutch region of New York and Pennsylvania was near New Jersey and that region particularly was even stricter than other colonies in African slave labor. In short, yes they had slave labor.
YES
had more ethnic diversity than either New England or the southern colonies.
The England army were better trained because the colonies army were a bunch of farmers.
because the royal colonies had a whole country backing them up.