The reason is simple:
Historically, in aerial engagements between two fighter aircraft, the goal was to get to behind the tail of the enemy aircraft, allowing cannon fire to easily hit the target. They are called dogfights because of their resemblance to two dogs playing, trying to catch each other's tails.
I believe a dogfight is an aerial battle amongst fighters
That is a good question because there are no photos or movie footage of an actual WW1 dogfight involving several aircraft. There were some photo published that was said to be photos of a dogfight but the experts proved it to be a fake. There are probably many verbal accounts by pilots of their experience in a dogfight. But it is difficult to get an idea of the distances and expanse of the battle. Were the aircraft in close formation? Did the aircraft keep in a tight "fur ball" (using verbage from WW2 pilots)? One famous dogfight that had several eye-witness accounts was the last dogfight with Werner Voss while he was flying a new Fokker Dr.1. This dogfight was a little lopsided--- 7 British against 1 German---so I don't consider it an example of a dogfight involving multiple aircraft. In this battle, the British were taken by surprise at how agile the Triplane was and how it could make a flat turn to turn his guns on his attacker. Many aircraft in the early war could easily stall. So, many aircraft probably fell out of combat early in the battle. This would lead to a quick end of the battle as the aircraft became seperated.
The early definition of the word 'dogfight' meant an aerial battle between two or more aircraft. As the First World War broke out not long after the aeroplane had been invented, there had not been time to develop guns which could be built into the body of a plane. The first fighter planes were only equipped with machine-guns which were fixed onto the top wing. These early fighter aircraft had two two seats, with a man sitting in the rear controlling the guns. Dogfights were extremely difficult because the pilot would have to dodge other enemy aircraft while listening to the commands of the gunner as to where to fly to get the enemy into his sights.
There were Chinese fighter planes and pilots which were to be trained by the Flying Tigers and other pilots. There planes were inferior and the Chinese did not have time to train because the Japanese were attacking them before they could get trained so the Flying Tigers did the aerial fighting. They trained as they could between battling so the Chinese could defend themselves. See the web link below for the real story of these wonderful heroes and the Chinese Air Force.
Redefined aerial jet warfare (modern aerial combat). The Vietnam War brought back the "gun" and "dog-fighting" to jet fighter pilots. The USN and USAF schools of TOP GUN and RED FLAG, as well as the super sonic F-15 Eagles, F-16 Falcons, F-18 Hornets, and F-22 Raptors are the direct results of the Vietnam War.
I believe a dogfight is an aerial battle amongst fighters
dogfight Dogfight was the popular term for one-on-one aerial battle between fighters. Does not apply to formation missions or bombing runs for obvious reasons.
Dog fight
An aerial combat at short range is known as a 'Dogfight'.
In aviation, a dogfight refers to a close-range aerial combat between fighter aircraft. It typically involves highly maneuverable planes engaging in a tactical battle to gain an advantageous position over each other. Dogfights are characterized by rapid maneuvers, strategic positioning, and the use of both guns and missiles. This type of combat requires exceptional piloting skills and situational awareness.
That is a good question because there are no photos or movie footage of an actual WW1 dogfight involving several aircraft. There were some photo published that was said to be photos of a dogfight but the experts proved it to be a fake. There are probably many verbal accounts by pilots of their experience in a dogfight. But it is difficult to get an idea of the distances and expanse of the battle. Were the aircraft in close formation? Did the aircraft keep in a tight "fur ball" (using verbage from WW2 pilots)? One famous dogfight that had several eye-witness accounts was the last dogfight with Werner Voss while he was flying a new Fokker Dr.1. This dogfight was a little lopsided--- 7 British against 1 German---so I don't consider it an example of a dogfight involving multiple aircraft. In this battle, the British were taken by surprise at how agile the Triplane was and how it could make a flat turn to turn his guns on his attacker. Many aircraft in the early war could easily stall. So, many aircraft probably fell out of combat early in the battle. This would lead to a quick end of the battle as the aircraft became seperated.
Aeroplanes fought in the air in world war one. It was also called an 'aerial dogfight' .
Jon Guttman has written: '\\' 'SE 5a vs Albatros D V' -- subject(s): World War, 1914-1918, German Aerial operations, Albatros D.V (Fighter plane), British Aerial operations, Campaigns, Fighter pilots, S.E.5 (Fighter plane), History 'SPAD XII/XIII Aces of World War 1 (Aircraft of the Aces)' 'Defiance at Sea' -- subject(s): History, Naval History, Naval battles 'SE 5a vs Albatros D V' -- subject(s): World War, 1914-1918, German Aerial operations, Albatros D.V (Fighter plane), British Aerial operations, Campaigns, Fighter pilots, S.E.5 (Fighter plane), History 'Bristol F2 Fighter Aces of World War I (Aircraft of the Aces)' 'SPAD XIII vs. Fokker D VII' -- subject(s): World War, 1914-1918, Fighter pilots, History, German Aerial operations, Fokker D.VII (Fighter plane), Spad (Fighter planes), Campaigns, French Aerial operations, American Aerial operations, SPAD S.XIII (Fighter plane) 'Sopwith Camel vs Fokker Dr I' -- subject(s): World War, 1914-1918, Camel (Fighter plane), Fokker Dr. I (Fighter plane), Design and construction, Campaigns, German Aerial operations, British Aerial operations
they place cameras in the cockpit or on the wings to film there fighting for proof, to teach new recruits or to show off. im a bit of dogfight freak
The F-4 Phantom II, the last aerial aces of the 20th century.
Alex Revell has written: 'British fighter units, Western Front, 1917-18' -- subject(s): Aerial operations, British, British Aerial operations, Fighter planes, Great Britain, Great Britain. Royal Air Force, History, World War, 1914-1918 'Fall of eagles' -- subject(s): Campaigns, World War, 1914-1918, Aerial operations, Fighter pilots, Personal narratives, Biography 'The vivid air' -- subject(s): Aerial operations, British, Biography, British Aerial operations, Fighter pilots, World War, 1914-1918, World War, 1939-1945 'No 60 Sqn RFC/RAF' -- subject(s): Campaigns, World War, 1914-1918, Great Britain, Markings, Great Britain. Royal Air Force. Squadron, Sixty, Great Britain. Royal Flying Corps. Squadron, 60, Regimental histories, British Aerial operations, Fighter planes, History 'British fighter units, Western Front, 1914-16' -- subject(s): Aerial operations, British, British Aerial operations, Great Britain, Great Britain. Royal Flying Corps, History, World War, 1914-1918 'Victoria Cross' -- subject(s): Aerial operations, British, Biography, British Aerial operations, Fighter pilots, Victoria Cross, World War, 1914-1918
If you mean the opening sequences of Revenge of the Sith, those scenes just show their skills as combat pilots and generals during an aerial dogfight