answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

Why were the Jews of the Netherlands were well-integrated into the general population?

They had been tolerated and viewed positively for a long time, which always tend to encourage assimilation/integration.


Advocates of assimilation regarded Native Americans as?

Advocates of assimilation regarded Native Americans as lesser than white Europeans and thought their culture was inferior. This movement persisted between 1790 and 1920.


What was the Aboriginal Assimilation Policy?

The aboriginal Assimilation Policy focussed on assimilating Aborigines into white society, and expecting the Aborigines to embrace white beliefs and values. The Assimilation policy, which was introduced in the 1950s (and actively pursued by the Federal Minister for territories, Paul Hasluck, from 1951 onwards), forced Aborigines off the reserves where they at least were protected to some degree (this was the policy of protectionism), and into the cities where they had to adopt White Australia values to survive. It was expected that such integration would improve their way of life. However, the Assimilation Policy did not improve conditions for the Aborigines, and they were denied the most basic of rights - that of being accepted as Australian citizens unless they applied for a "certificate". Applying for a certificate meant denying one's aboriginal heritage and severing all ties with one's own indigenous community.


What nations supported assimilation?

France


Is assimilation truly a more effective approach than annihilation in fostering unity and understanding among diverse groups?

Assimilation and annihilation are both controversial methods for promoting unity among diverse groups. Assimilation involves integrating different cultures into a dominant one, while annihilation seeks to eliminate differences altogether. However, assimilation is generally considered more effective in fostering unity and understanding, as it allows for the preservation of cultural identities while promoting cooperation and mutual respect. Annihilation, on the other hand, can lead to conflict, resentment, and the loss of valuable diversity.

Related Questions

What is the best synonym for integration?

Unification, amalgamation, union, combination, assimilation... a+ consolidation


Difference between assimilation and true integration?

Assimilation involves conforming to the dominant culture, often at the expense of one's own cultural identity. True integration, on the other hand, entails embracing different cultures in a way that respects and values diversity while fostering understanding and cooperation among them. Integration promotes inclusivity, while assimilation can lead to cultural erasure.


How are integration and assimilation alike?

Integration and assimilation both involve the process of individuals or groups becoming part of a new culture or society. Both concepts imply some level of adaptation and interaction with the new environment. However, assimilation typically implies a more complete absorption or adoption of the new culture, while integration may allow for the preservation of some aspects of the original culture.


What was the policy of integration and How was it different to assimilation?

The policy of integration allowed Aboriginal people to practice their culture and religion while living amongst people of other cultures and religions. Assimilation on the other hand was a policy to absorb Aboriginal people into white society.


What are some words that mean the same thing as Integration?

combination, union, mixture, synthesis, alliance, unification, assimilation, amalgamation


What is the Assimilation policy aboriginals?

Integration was a policy which said Aboriginal people could continue their cultural beliefs and live alongside others of different cultures. the Integration policy was introduced, supposedly to give Aboriginal people more control over their lives and society.


Why were the Jews of the Netherlands were well-integrated into the general population?

They had been tolerated and viewed positively for a long time, which always tend to encourage assimilation/integration.


What are pros and cons of assimilation?

Pros of assimilation: promotes unity and social cohesion by creating a shared cultural identity, enhances communication and understanding among diverse groups, and can lead to increased opportunities for social and economic integration. Cons of assimilation: may erase individual cultural identities and traditions, can lead to marginalization and discrimination of cultural minorities, and may perpetuate power imbalances and inequalities within society.


What is the difference between assimilation and integration of ethnic relation?

Assimilation means absorbing minorities into the ways of the majority - requiring them to adopt the majority's language, customs and 'values'.Integration, by contrast, requires acceptance of a country's laws, of human rights such as freedom of speech, and of basic democratic rights, but does not require the eradication of all cultural differences or group-identities; it is conceived of as a two-way process, through which both the majority and the minorities influence and change one another, and in which differences can be peacefully accommodated as long is there a common commitment to living together.


What does Massey and spatial assimilation thesis say about ethnic enclaves?

Massey's spatial assimilation thesis posits that ethnic enclaves can initially provide immigrants with social and economic support, but over time, they may hinder full integration into the broader society. While these enclaves offer a sense of community and cultural preservation, they can also limit access to resources and opportunities that facilitate upward mobility. Ultimately, as immigrants assimilate and achieve better socioeconomic status, they tend to move out of these enclaves, leading to greater spatial dispersion and integration into mainstream society.


Is assimilation always bad?

Assimilation can have both positive and negative impacts. It can promote social cohesion and integration by creating a sense of belonging and unity. However, it can also lead to the loss of cultural diversity and the suppression of marginalized identities. It is important to approach assimilation with caution and consider its implications on different communities.


What term refers to the process by which a social group becomes part of another social group?

Assimilation is the term that refers to the process by which a social group becomes part of another social group. It involves the integration of individuals from one group into the cultural norms and practices of another group.