The edits can give more information.
because it was lucky
They had good farming
The original 95 Theses was discontinued because the customers were upset that is was not as good as the other products that other companies were making unfortunately.
Historians rely on primary sources to reach conclusions. Gaps in history, where there is no written documentation of events may leave historians in a quandary. They must then rely on archaeological evidence, and secondary sources, if available. Historians must ask the following: Is the information reliable? What was the reputation of the writer at the time? Does the archaeological record, primary, or secondary sources disagree with previously published historiography concerning the person or event? How accurate is prior published historiography concerning the subject matter? New evidence can displace old theories regarding history, so historians must be ready to adjust their thesis to reflect this information. Historians must also recognize that myth may shroud the truth about history. "Lost Cause" mythology concerning the American Civil War is a good example of lies perpetuated as history that has been disproved by primary sources.
Catholic Monks, present all over Europe. Were really good at writing things down in books. And so they documented viking raids and warfare.
sometimes it is edited if she dose not good singing on the song. :)
This is because its a fake video. This is probably a very good edited video. This is because its a fake video. This is probably a very good edited video.
You can share it with as many people as possible and the image can be edited without losing its original quality
No, Not at all.
They had good sewage system designs, good location, and good artifacts
Historians need good critical thinking skills to analyze and evaluate sources of information, draw logical conclusions based on evidence, and interpret historical events accurately. Critical thinking enables historians to approach their research with a questioning mindset and avoid bias in their interpretations. It also helps historians uncover hidden connections and enhance their understanding of historical phenomena.
yes it is as good as the original unless the game is stuffed or something
I have found Wikipedia to be a pretty good website for reliable information in most categories except those of a political nature, where controversial subjects can be edited to become one-sided or with a vested interest. Just for fun I edited a page, not saying what page, but I edited it with a joke my friend and I had about this specific topic. The information is completely inaccurate, and is still there after a year and 3 months.
Chalk this one up to "style" or to the "mood" of the individual. Certainly it isn't in any "real" book on style, and it isn't a good way to introduce yourself. Questions or answers here that are presented with an upper case letter on every word have to be edited at some point. There is really nothing "stylish" about this, and it's a good habbit to get out of.
It depends what you like. If you like rap then Eminem( I think edited version is better).
Lots of historians believe that Arthur made a good king by doing the exact opposite of what his father did.
Time and historians will decide that question.