answersLogoWhite

0

Siege warfare is detrimental because it leads to prolonged suffering for civilians trapped in the besieged area, often resulting in starvation, disease, and lack of medical care. It can also cause significant destruction to infrastructure, making recovery difficult for the affected population. Additionally, sieges can escalate conflicts, prolong wars, and complicate peace negotiations, as the humanitarian crises they create often exacerbate tensions between warring parties.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

12mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are the bad points for using a siege?

it can hurt you


What was bad and good about the siege tower?

Siege towers were of benefit in breaching enemy defenses/fortifications . For those within the siege engine itself they were in danger of having boiling oil scalding them and if the tower were set alight then those trapped could be burned alive or subject to missiles as they attempted to exit and flee from the tower itself .


What tactic did Ulysses S. Grant use successfully against the confederates at peters-burg?

a siege


What were the siege guns used for?

to siege


What is the duration of Alien Siege?

The duration of Under Siege is 1.72 hours.


What replaced siege engines?

Siege engines, catapaults and the like, were replaced by siege cannon and mortars.


What did Edward I do to Kenilworth Castle?

He defeated it in a siege by starving the occupants out. This siege was the longest siege in England.


What is the plural of siege?

The plural of siege is sieges.


How would you use siege in a sentence?

The city of Vicksburg was under siege for several weeks in 1863.


What is the plural form of siege?

The plural of siege is sieges.


What was the siege of Gettysburg?

Gettysburg was a Battle of Engagement, not a Siege.


What are the good and bad points about a siege?

It depends on what perspective(s) you are studying - strategical/military, environmental, socioeconomic, etc. From a military point of view, sieges are good for the army that is sieging because casualties can be greatly reduced as opposed to rushing a fortified position. Sieges are bad for the sieging army because they are expensive since they can take a lot of time - soldiers need to be fed and paid, disease can spread through the army, supplies can run low and the siege can fail if it is not well supplied. Sieges are good for the army getting sieged because there is time to make plans, regroup, make better defenses, and all while not suffering too many casualties. Sieges are bad for the army getting sieged because supply routes are cut off, so food and water stocks will be worn out as the siege progresses. Siege equipment will also damage the fortification during the process of the siege. There are just a few things but there are surely more that you can think about!