The answer is false.
Anti-miscegenation laws were not covered in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These laws made interracial marriage illegal. However, a 1967 Supreme Court ruling declared these laws unconstitutional.
The event that is considered to be the catalyst for the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. The Supreme Court declared that segregation in schools was unconstitutional.
Andrew Jackson
These declarations claimed that states have the right to consider void any act of Congress that they deem unconstitutional.
The answer is false.
false
Enforced separate but equal. In other words, it enforced segregation. It was changed in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (100 years later) which said Segregation= Unequal= Unconstitutional.
No. The Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") did not deal with civil unions. In any event, DOMA has been struck down as unconstitutional and is no longer in effect.
an example of a bill that is unconstitutional is attainder
The Judicial Branch can declare an act of the President unconstitutional.
Anti-miscegenation laws were not covered in the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These laws made interracial marriage illegal. However, a 1967 Supreme Court ruling declared these laws unconstitutional.
The event that is considered to be the catalyst for the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. The Supreme Court declared that segregation in schools was unconstitutional.
Determine whether a president's actions violate the constitution.
yes
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 both aimed to eliminate discrimination and ensure equal rights for all citizens, particularly African Americans. Each act sought to address issues of racial segregation and promote equality in public accommodations, schools, and employment. However, while the 1875 Act was largely ineffective and ultimately declared unconstitutional in 1883, the 1964 Act was more robustly enforced and marked a significant advancement in the civil rights movement, laying the groundwork for further progress in racial equality.
Judicial Branch