That is the way they were seen. If a person wasn't a Roman he/she was seen as a barbarian ( Greek for other) and treated very rudely and harshly. The Huns were barbarian and were very good horsemen, excellent fighters, and fierce in battle. They didn't fight using the Roman battle methods and to the Romans this barbaric.
Read the account of the battle in the account by historian Herodotos to compare it.
nobles drank bear and chased wemen while the peasants did farm work and looked after there animals. they compare by the amount of money they they have got.
You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.You could compare a forum to a shopping plaza in modern society. You may also compare it to a civic center such as a city's "downtown" area.
compare and contrast of paradise book 1 and book9
Have a war to be started
A Roman historian like Ammianus Marcellinus might compare the Huns to unthinking animals to emphasize their perceived barbarism and savagery, contrasting them with the more "civilized" Roman culture. This comparison could serve to dehumanize the Huns, making their violent actions seem more instinctual and less rational, thereby justifying Roman fears and hostilities towards them. Additionally, such imagery would resonate with Roman audiences, reinforcing their cultural superiority and the need for military vigilance against perceived threats.
That is the way they were seen. If a person wasn't a Roman he/she was seen as a barbarian ( Greek for other) and treated very rudely and harshly. The Huns were barbarian and were very good horsemen, excellent fighters, and fierce in battle. They didn't fight using the Roman battle methods and to the Romans this barbaric.
When Marcellinus describes the Huns as being "glued to their horses," he is emphasizing their exceptional skill and familiarity with horseback riding. This phrase suggests that the Huns were highly adept at riding horses and had a strong bond with their animals, indicating a deep connection and reliance on their equestrian abilities for mobility and warfare. The image evoked is one of seamless coordination and unity between the Huns and their horses, highlighting their prowess as mounted warriors.
Read the account of the battle in the account by historian Herodotos to compare it.
there r thins on the plants here like jerms
Yes.
I bieleve it is the they compare animals by the texonimy theary.... Sorry if I got it wrong.... And sorry for not having many details...
Raised germ free
They r both animals
No.
both are animals!:)
to known species