He wasn't scared. He was angry because he believed what Jesus was saying to him was blasphemy.
King Herod went crazy,because he was afraid Jesus would take his throne.
Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.Herod was supposed to be afraid of the baby Jesus because of the unrest a "new king" would possibly bring. This is according to the New Testament. However, historically there is no record of Herod ever ordering a slaughter of infants. (He was certainly capable of doing it) This remains a theological/historical thorn in the side of researchers.
he was afraid of scorpions and spiders
Jewish people, I think.
Everyone is afraid of General Payne.
Yes he was questioned by Caiphas the high priest.
Matthew 26:57 says that after jesus was arrested they took him away to Caiphas first. John 28:13 says that after Jesus was arrested they took him away to Annas first. After Jesus was examined by either Caiphas (Luke 26) or by Annas (John 28), He was then brought to the Sanhedrin. After the Sanhedrin, Jesus was brought to Pontius Pilate. After Pontius Pilate, Jesus was taken to Herod, tetrarch off Galilee, who was attending the Passover at Jerusalem.
The chief priest who had Jesus arrested was Caiaphas. He was the high priest during the time of Jesus' crucifixion and played a significant role in the events leading to Jesus' arrest and subsequent trial.
They were afraid of Jesus, the priests thought Jesus was getting more powerful then them, and more followers.
they were afraid that jesus might be killed by king herod at that time
The father-in-law of Caiaphas, the high priest during the time of Jesus, was Annas. Annas had served as high priest before Caiaphas and still held influence within the priesthood.
Peter denied Jesus because he was afraid if the crowd, who wanted to kill Jesus, knew he was one of Jesus' disciples. They would want to kill him as well. Overall, he was afraid of prison and death.
Be of good cheer it is you be not afraid!!!
they are afraid of the smell of onion and garlic. If they touch silver, they feel uncontrolable pain............ they are afraid from the cross of jesus...........
They were scared and confused, as they were suddenly with out their Lord Jesus. And afraid that the Romans would crucify them as well.
There is no clear answer to whether Jesus was afraid of the crucifixion, as different interpretations exist. Some believe that Jesus experienced fear and anguish before his crucifixion, while others believe that he faced it with courage and acceptance. Ultimately, it is a matter of personal belief and interpretation of religious texts.
The disciples were both confused, afraid, angry and sad about Jesus Crucifixion because they had not fully understood Jesus' explanation about his upcoming death and resurrection.