because he just was xD
No, he was a good leader who sometimes did bad things.
he was not a bad leader, but he threw people of the throne.
Gratian was he was 8 years old at his Accession. he ruled from 364-375 i believe however he arguably was never a true emperor because he shared rule with his father and uncle for the whole of his regime. Hope this helps
i think caesar was a bad leader for many reasons. heres an example i think he was a bad leader, he became a dictator illegally.
it reaveled alexander was a very bad leader
Elagabalus was born in 203.
Elagabalus died on 222-03-11.
Elagabalus, also known as Heliogabalus, who ruled as Roman emperor from 218 to 222 AD, was known for his extravagant and scandalous behavior. He was accused of committing numerous atrocities, including murdering family members, engaging in incestuous relationships, and desecrating religious traditions, such as introducing the worship of the sun god Elagabalus to Rome. Elagabalus's reign was marked by instability and ended with his assassination at the age of 18.
Only he or she can say.
69 Sherlock
No, he was a good leader who sometimes did bad things.
he was not a bad leader, but he threw people of the throne.
He was murdered. He was 18 or 19 years old when he died.
poor leader
There is no term for a bad leader, but you could say a tyrant is a bad leader because tyrants seize power by force.
He was murdered by the Praetorian guard on 11th March 222 A.D.
Gratian was he was 8 years old at his Accession. he ruled from 364-375 i believe however he arguably was never a true emperor because he shared rule with his father and uncle for the whole of his regime. Hope this helps