answersLogoWhite

0

Basically yes he was.

Lee was capable of being both bold and aggressive when necessary but was also understand the value of defending fortified positions.

Lee was not afraid to take enourmous risks, he frequently split his Army in the face of a superior enemy and used it to out manoveur and destroy larger forces. The most famous example of this is Chancellorville where leaving only a few brigades to defend his front he sent Jacksons entire wing of the army on a flanking march that crushed the Union position and ended the immediate threat to Richmond.

Following this and other victories Lee became something of a bogeyman for Union commanders and often caused unwarranted hesitancy and fear in his opponants minds.

After the death of Jackson he was however unable to find a replacement corps commander of suitable iniative and aggression and this was the main reason for the dfeat at Gettysburg.

Towards the end of the war dwindling numbers of Confederate troops and the strategy of the Union forces under US Grant forced Lee to abandon his prefered style of a war of manouver and instead dig trenches and other field fortifications. He proved to be equally adept at this aspect of warfare and inflicted further tactical defeats on Union forces as they tried to storm Confederate defenses.

Ultimately Lee's forces where worn down by a relentless was of attrition and handicapped by the need to defend ever longer trench lines against a numerically superior enemy, Lee was eventually forced to surrender his army which largely marked the end of armed Confederate resistance.

Lee's weaknesses were that when 'his blood was up' meaning he was in an aggressive state of mind he would tend to prefer frontal attacks on the enemy which resulted in heavy losses for his forces, the most famous example if Picketts Charge on the third day of Gettyburg, another noticable example would the battle of Malvern Hill. As stated he found it hard to find a replacement for Jackson and Lee was never able to operate as effectively offensively again, his choices to replace Jackson (Ewell and Hill) in retrospect turned out to be poor choices

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?