0
Think about it. They were in an area where you couldn't really see them (aside from the occasional rifle or Maxim machine gun sticking up), but they had a perfect view of you. But, if you were to get into the trench with your flamethrower, you could easily clear hundreds of yards for your platoon. Did this help?
What else can I help you with?
Why was trench warfare ineffective during World War I?
Trench warfare was ineffective during World War I because it led to a stalemate, with neither side able to make significant advances. The static nature of trench warfare made it difficult to gain ground and resulted in high casualties without achieving decisive victories. Additionally, the conditions in the trenches were harsh, with soldiers facing disease, poor sanitation, and constant danger from enemy attacks.
Do you do whatever is necessary to gain an advantage over your competition?
no
What does sapping and tunneling mean in World War 1?
Sapping referred to the method of digging tunnels underground to undermine enemy lines or defensive positions during World War 1. It allowed troops to approach their targets unseen and launch surprise attacks. Tunneling, on the other hand, specifically referred to the practice of constructing tunnels by specialist tunneling companies for various purposes, such as mining beneath enemy positions to plant explosives. Both tactics were used by both sides to gain an advantage in trench warfare.
What was the trench warfare and why was it difficult in World War 1?
Trench warfare was when the soldiers would sit in large dug out holes and pop their heads up to shoot at the enemies. They did this because the flat land they were fighting on held no place to hide or conduct surprise attack. They would basically just be in these trenches trying to kill their enemies. It was difficult to gain any land and move while they were fighting because as soon as you got out of the trench you were an easy target. The armies would lose the majority of their soldiers during these fights. It was difficult because they were in these trenches for days on end and they would often get flooded with water which would get into their shoes and cause oozing sores. They didn't really have any supplies on the way either They had not much food or fresh clothes, (not even underwear!) and it was sort of like waiting in line to get shot.
What are the Negatives of trench warfare?
Trench Warfare was a stale mate. Sides were covered from enemy fire, but they couldn't advance themselves to win the battle. When they did charge threw no man's land, they were greeted by enemy fire and they didn't gain much ground. Trench foot was a negative. Trench foot would get so bad that a man would take off his shoe and his foot would stay in it. Mustard gas was also a negative. Enemies would fire mustard gas which if it landed on you would eat your clothes and burn your skin. Many men would get huge blisters. If you breathed it in, you would die a slow painful death. Rats and cockroaches were the mens only companions. Everything else was killed. Trees, grass, and plants were nowhere in sight. Mud was almost always engulping the trenches. Men would sleep in it. There are many other negatives these are just a few of the main ones.
Why was it difficult to gain an advantage over the enemy in trench warfare?
It was hard because they were entrenched in their position, and when not moving forward they are on the defensive. Much of the trench warfare resulted in a deadlock, because of the difficulty of gaining ground. It was difficult because of the no-man's-land in between the enemy trenches covered with barbed wire, and the machine guns that could totally annihilate an entire charge.
Why was it dificut to gain on advantage over your enemy in trench warfare?
There were problems, because it was hard to gain any ground, and the conditions in the trenches were absolutely terrible. They were strewn with dead bodies and waste, not to mention all the mud from rain. It was very unsanitary; trench warfare was really quite terrible.
Why did battles on the western front result in little territorial gain in WW1?
Trench warfare made the movement of troops difficult
Why was trench warfare ineffective during World War I?
Trench warfare was ineffective during World War I because it led to a stalemate, with neither side able to make significant advances. The static nature of trench warfare made it difficult to gain ground and resulted in high casualties without achieving decisive victories. Additionally, the conditions in the trenches were harsh, with soldiers facing disease, poor sanitation, and constant danger from enemy attacks.
Does kakaski die?
Yes, What the Japanese do is train people who are willing to die by driving their planes into enemy ships etc. to gain strategic advantage. MiniGenius™
What advantage did the union gain from the entire mississippi river?
It cut off all Confederate units West of the river, and denied the enemy all use of this major waterway for transporting troops and material.
What is something you can buy in Monopoly that can help you gain an advantage over your opponents?
In Monopoly, you can buy properties to gain an advantage over your opponents.
What permanent are you willing to sacrifice in order to gain an advantage in the game?
In the game, what permanent are you willing to give up permanently to gain an advantage?
What is the advantage of emitter follower?
The advantage of the emitter follower is that it has a positive gain of 1.
What is the synonym for advantage?
favor, dominance, gain
What advantage did Germany gain from the pact with the soviet?
they gain nothing puy dead men
What does it mean to conquer someone or something?
To conquer someone or something means to defeat them or gain control over them through force, power, or strategy. It can also refer to overcoming challenges or obstacles in order to achieve a goal or overcome a difficult situation.
