answersLogoWhite

0

== == It was not until 1889 that the Judiciary of the Privy Council endorsed Terra nullius with the handing down of the decision of Cooper v Stuart. To this day, even since Mabo and Wik, there is some controversy as to the meaning of the term. Some argue that, rather than implying completely uninhabited, "terra nullius" can be interpreted to mean simply an absence of civilized society. The English common law of the time allowed for the legal settlement of any "uninhabited or barbarous country" ... 'barbarous' implying habitation by barbarians was inclusive. Subsequent to various land rights cases mounted through the 1970's the Australian High Court left the door open for a re-assessment of whether the continent should be considered as having been "settled" or "conquered". In 1992 'terra nullius Australis' was directly overturned in the Judgement of the Eddy Mabo case, wherein it was found there was a concept of "native title", based upon a traditional connection to or occupation of land, subject to various qualifiers. The Wik case revised this in 1996 to allow pastoral leases and native title to co-exist over the same area and in the event of a conflict of rights arising, the rights of the pastoralist would prevail.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the doctrine of terra nullius?

Terra Nullius means "land that belongs to no-one". This doctrine applied to Australia in 1788 when the British did not recognise that the indigenous people of Australia were the rightful "owners" of the land. Because the Aborigines were seen as little more than black savages, the British considered that Australia belonged to no-one and that it was within their right to claim the land as their own, and to do with it (and its people) whatever they wished. The British sought to expand their empire, and so they applied the doctrine of 'terra nullius' to Australia as that gave them the right to claim and occupy the continent.


What effect did terra nullius have on Australia?

Terra Nullius means "land that belongs to no-one".By applying this concept to Australia in 1788, it simplified the act of colonisation of Australia by the British. Great Britain sought to expand its empire, and so the country applied the doctrine of 'terra nullius' to Australia as that gave them the right to claim and occupy the continent. Britain was able to prove to the satisfaction of its judicial system that Australia was terra nullius - a land without ownership - because the English found difficulty in locating any individual(s) able to negotiate a treaty with the indigenous inhabitants.


Why did the British use the words terra nullius?

Terra Nullius means "land that belongs to no-one".This applied to Australia in 1788 because the British did not recognise that the indigenous people of Australia were the rightful "owners" of the land. Because the Aborigines were seen as little more than black savages, the British considered that Australia belonged to no-one and that it was within their right to claim the land as their own, and to do with it (and its people) whatever they wished.


How does Terra Nullius and Mabo relate ro aborigines?

The Mabo vs. Queensland (02) case abolished the concept of terra nullius from Australian law. This meant that the Aboriginal people were finally acknowledged as having been there back in 1788 when the British settled, instead of Australia being a land belonging to no one.


How did Australia's relationship with England change from 1788 to 1914?

There was no relationship between England(Britain) and Australia(Terra Nullis)BEFORE 1788. In 1788, the First Fleet (11 ships) came to Australia. These ships had convicts, food and officers on them. The ships transported them to Port Jackson at Botney Bay in New South Wales and they built a settlement. Australia was referred to 'Terra Nullis' until 1901 where Australia was given it's name 'Australia'. So basically, Australia was a 'convict dumping place' to England from 1788 till 1914 where World War 1 started, and Australia decided that they would help England defend their offenders.


Was the british seizure of Australia legal?

The British seizure of Australia in 1788 is often considered illegal under international law, as it involved taking land from Indigenous peoples without their consent or recognition of their sovereignty. The British claimed Australia as "terra nullius," or land belonging to no one, which disregarded the existing rights of Indigenous Australians. This legal justification has been widely criticized and is seen as a historical injustice, leading to ongoing debates about land rights and reconciliation.


What was western Australia called in 1788?

Western Australia was known as New Holland in 1788.


When did Britain claim the entire Australian continent?

Britain claimed the entire Australian continent on January 26, 1788, when Captain Arthur Phillip arrived at Botany Bay and established the first British colony at Sydney. This event marked the beginning of British colonization in Australia, which was formalized through the doctrine of terra nullius, meaning the land was considered unoccupied despite the presence of Indigenous peoples. The claim was further solidified by subsequent exploration and settlement throughout the continent.


How many ships came to Australia in 1788?

Eleven ships came to Australia with the First Fleet of convicts in 1788.


What year did white settlement in Australia?

White settlement in Australia commenced in 1788, with the arrival of the First Fleet.


Why do you have Australia?

We have Australia now because it was colonised by the British in 1788.


When did australia become a colony?

1788