0
the Peloponnesian war was bad for the losers because the Athenians which were the losers, lost their homeland and it was also bad for the winners because the winners were all the city-states and after the war they won a lot people lost their jobs and their home. It was also bad for the winners because the Spartans and the other city-states lost a lot of men afetr the war.
What else can I help you with?
Why was the french and Indian war fought what did the losers lose what did the winners win?
Well, we learned about this topic in class. Since it was so far back, i assume we don't know as of know. Though i assume they went dancing in the clubs!JKLOL!
Who were the winners and losers in the new consumer society of the 1920s?
In the 1920s, winners in the new consumer society included industries such as automobiles, household appliances, and entertainment, which thrived due to mass production and advertising, leading to a boom in consumer culture. The middle class benefited significantly from increased disposable income and access to new products. Conversely, losers included traditional artisans and small businesses that struggled to compete with mass-produced goods, as well as marginalized groups like farmers and African Americans, who did not share equally in the decade's prosperity and faced economic and social challenges.
Which war had an effect on the Roman Republic - Punic Wars Persian War Peloponnesian War the Crusades?
Punic Wars established Rome as unchallenged in the Western Mediterranean, and their decision to punish Macedonia for supporting Carthage led them to progressively take over the eastern Mediterranean as well. The Persian, Peloponnesian Wars and Crusades did not involve Rome.
Did Zeno fight in the peloponnesian war?
No, Zeno did not fight in the Peloponnesian War. Zeno of Citium, the founder of Stoicism, lived later than the war, which took place from 431 to 404 BCE. He was born around 334 BCE, well after the conflict had ended. Zeno is primarily known for his philosophical contributions rather than military involvement.
War weakens the Greek city states?
War means loss of manpower - and of course it is the fittest males who die. This was not always a negative, as an excess of young men meant that there was no land for them to farm - the family farms were too small to subdivide, and these landless became a sub-class with the resultant internal strife which comes from the alienated propertyless. It is for that reason the cities sent out colonies around the Mediterranean and Black Sea littorals - they could be allotted land and become citizens of the new city. But of course, the winner of war may well be strengthened - by gaining additional territory and plunder. States usually fight because of advantage to be gained, so there are winners and losers. It was only in such wars as the Peloponnesian War that the devastation was widespread, and eventually led to the ascendancy of Macedonia over the city-states weakened by a century of widespread war.
Why was the peloponnesian was bad for the winners as well as the losers?
the Peloponnesian war was bad for the losers because the Athenians which were the losers, lost their homeland and it was also bad for the winners because the winners were all the city-states and after the war they won a lot people lost their jobs and their home. It was also bad for the winners because the Spartans and the other city-states lost a lot of men afetr the war.
How do you highlight winners and losers on your NCAA tournament bracket?
Well, I'd recommend just using a yellow highlighter for the winners and red or some other color for the losers (if it's on paper).
Who were the winners and losers of World War 2?
The winners were the Allies, consisting mainly of England, America and Russia, along with France, Canada, and some others. The losers were the Axis, consisting mainly of Germany and Japan, as well as Italy and some others.
Why was it bad for the winners and the losers?
It was bad for the winners of the war because they often faced economic strain from the cost of the conflict, had to deal with the aftermath of destruction, and had to navigate the political consequences of their victory. For the losers, they faced occupation, reparations, loss of territory, and social upheaval, as well as having to rebuild their nation after the devastation of the war.
Why was the french and Indian war fought what did the losers lose what did the winners win?
Well, we learned about this topic in class. Since it was so far back, i assume we don't know as of know. Though i assume they went dancing in the clubs!JKLOL!
Why do the winners of wars get to tell the stories and not losers?
usually because the losing nation does not want to spread its shame or lie in order to make it look like they won. Imagine a World War II game made by the Nazis, how well would that work answer: not very well at all.
Why is the tundra environment endangered?
Well... CBA LOsers
How did you feel when you wrote wacky Wednesday?
It felt good because i could show off my feeling og how i feel on wednesday! well byee LOsers
What is a good battle name?
Well it could be Wild Bate, Sources Forces, Titanic Panic, Loosened Turtle, Ugly Boxers, Stanpied Losers, or The Ghost.
Is mobster virus?
well of course not it is a social media gaming application in which losers play to make themselves seem cool by killing other losers.
Who were the winners and losers in the new consumer society of the 1920s?
In the 1920s, winners in the new consumer society included industries such as automobiles, household appliances, and entertainment, which thrived due to mass production and advertising, leading to a boom in consumer culture. The middle class benefited significantly from increased disposable income and access to new products. Conversely, losers included traditional artisans and small businesses that struggled to compete with mass-produced goods, as well as marginalized groups like farmers and African Americans, who did not share equally in the decade's prosperity and faced economic and social challenges.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of being national?
The advantage is that with hard work and luck anyone can make it to the top. The disadvantage is that the cake is a lie, don't trust the pie either. In other words, it's more who you know than what you know that determines success. And that their are definite losers as well as winners in your society.
