0
Militarily; the VC were virtually eliminated as a structured effective combat force...they still existed...but the NVA took over much of the fighting against US forces after TET. Militarily; the communists (NVA/VC) demonstrated that not only were they NOT a defeated foe; they showed that they had the capability to strike anywhere, anytime; with lots of firepower. This would happen again during the NVA's Easter Offensive in '72; only it would be a tank led conventional attack. US B52s would stop them! Politically, it tore the American people more in half than they were before TET. When Walter Cronkite made his famous statement concerning the TET offensive (saying it was now a lost cause)...President LBJ stated, "...if I've lost Cronkite, I've lost the war." LBJ went on public television stating he would NOT serve another term as the President of the United States.
What else can I help you with?
How did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz define the total defeat of an enemy?
In its most basic form, Carl Von Clausewitz defined the total defeat of an enemy as military operations that were not necessarily political, although the defeat of the enemy would have political effects. But before the political ramifications were realized, Clausewitz defined total victory as the destruction of the enemy's armies and the conquest of its territory.
What was the military end state for Operation TORCH?
It was an Allied victory with the defeat of the Vichy French forces.
What made American victory at battle of saratoga a turning point in war?
France decided America could defeat Britain and provided military support.
Who said humble in victory gracious in defeat?
Strive to be humble in victory and gracious in defeat. - Boots WilliamsRead more: Who_said_Humble_in_victory_and_gracious_in_defeat
What is an Pyrrhic?
A Pyrrhic victory is a victory with devastating cost to the victor; it carries the implication that another such victory will ultimately cause defeat. a metrical foot that features two unstressed syllables
How did military theorist Carl Von Clausewitz define the total defeat of an enemy?
In its most basic form, Carl Von Clausewitz defined the total defeat of an enemy as military operations that were not necessarily political, although the defeat of the enemy would have political effects. But before the political ramifications were realized, Clausewitz defined total victory as the destruction of the enemy's armies and the conquest of its territory.
How was the Tet Offensive both a victory and a defeat for the US?
The Tet offensive was military a massive failure by the Vietcong in which they achieved no strategic success and lost a large number of fighters. However, it was terrible for the american army morale, who had been frequently told that they were winning and the North Vietnamese were on the brink of collapse, which was clearly not the case based on the size and penetration of the Tet Offensive showed this was untrue, and it also showed that many South Vietnamese were supporting the Vietcong and not the Americans, which again damaged morale. The same sort of thing happened to the US public, which made the Vietnam War slowly become a huge public discussion, and a political liability to the government which supported the war that the American public collectively believed could not be won. For a military historian the Tet Offensive was an American victory, for the wider historian it was the beginning of the end of America's admitting defeat in Vietnam.
What was the military end state for Operation TORCH?
It was an Allied victory with the defeat of the Vichy French forces.
When was Defeat into Victory created?
Defeat into Victory was created in 1961.
Was the tet offensive a political defeat for the US?
It led to Johnson's decision to not run for another term.
For what is Dien Bien Phu remembered?
The battle of Dien Bien Phu is remembered for the significance the defeat the Viet Minh had over French forces and the political and military ramifications the defeat /victory had for both sides as well as the effect it had upon future actions there in the Vietnamese arena of war and politics .
What are the effects of dien bien phu?
The battle of Dien Bien Phu is remembered for the significance the defeat the Viet Minh had over French forces and the political and military ramifications the defeat /victory had for both sides as well as the effect it had upon future actions there in the Vietnamese arena of war and politics .
How many pages does Defeat into Victory have?
Defeat into Victory has 576 pages.
What is the ISBN of Defeat into Victory?
The ISBN of Defeat into Victory is 978-0330509978.
How was tet offensive both a victory and a defeat for the US?
The Tet offensive was military a massive failure by the Vietcong in which they achieved no strategic success and lost a large number of fighters. However, it was terrible for the american army morale, who had been frequently told that they were winning and the North Vietnamese were on the brink of collapse, which was clearly not the case based on the size and penetration of the Tet Offensive showed this was untrue, and it also showed that many South Vietnamese were supporting the Vietcong and not the Americans, which again damaged morale. The same sort of thing happened to the US public, which made the Vietnam War slowly become a huge public discussion, and a political liability to the government which supported the war that the American public collectively believed could not be won. For a military historian the Tet Offensive was an American victory, for the wider historian it was the beginning of the end of America's admitting defeat in Vietnam.
How was the Tet offensive both a victory and defeat for the us?
The Tet offensive was military a massive failure by the Vietcong in which they achieved no strategic success and lost a large number of fighters. However, it was terrible for the american army morale, who had been frequently told that they were winning and the North Vietnamese were on the brink of collapse, which was clearly not the case based on the size and penetration of the Tet Offensive showed this was untrue, and it also showed that many South Vietnamese were supporting the Vietcong and not the Americans, which again damaged morale. The same sort of thing happened to the US public, which made the Vietnam War slowly become a huge public discussion, and a political liability to the government which supported the war that the American public collectively believed could not be won. For a military historian the Tet Offensive was an American victory, for the wider historian it was the beginning of the end of America's admitting defeat in Vietnam.
Who said Humble in victory and gracious in defeat?
Strive to be humble in victory and gracious in defeat. - Boots Williams
