answersLogoWhite

0

It was not the (expected) ruling against Scott's freedom that caused the controversy.

It was the reason given - that they claimed slavery was protected by the Constitution. If taken literally, this would invalidate all of the compromises between North and South, and make slavery legal in any state of the Union.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What did Frederick Douglass say about the Dred Scott ruling?

Frederick Douglass vehemently opposed the Dred Scott ruling, which denied citizenship and constitutional rights to African Americans. He viewed the Supreme Court's decision as a grave injustice that perpetuated the institution of slavery and undermined the ideals of freedom and equality. Douglass argued that the ruling was not only a setback for African Americans but also a betrayal of the principles upon which the nation was founded. He called for resistance and activism in the fight for civil rights and justice.


What role did the Dred Scott v. Sandford Supreme Court decision play in contributing to the outbreak of the Civil War?

The Dred Scott v. Sandford Supreme Court decision worsened tensions between the North and South by ruling that African Americans were not citizens and had no rights under the Constitution. This decision fueled the debate over slavery and states' rights, ultimately contributing to the outbreak of the Civil War.


What are facts about the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?


Where did the Dred Scott Decision occur?

In the Supreme Court.


The US Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision stated that?

After 10 years of appeals in a lower court, the Supreme Court decided that all people of African descent, whether slave or free, could not be US citizens, and hence couldn't sue in federal court. Another ruling outcome of this case was that the federal government had no power to prohibit slavery in its territories.In one of he worst Supreme Court rulings in history, the court decided against Scott, saying that he remained the property of his master, and that free states were obligated to abide by the laws of the slave states.

Related Questions

What problems might result from the supreme courts ruling in the dred Scott case?

That all black people are banned from this country.


What problems might result from the supreme courts ruling in the dreds Scott case?

That all black people are banned from this country.


What was the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?

That Scott had no right to argue in court


What did the supreme court ruling the dred Scott case establish?

The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.


What was the supreme courts ruling in Dred Scott V. Sanford?

The Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered United States citizens and therefore could not file lawsuits in federal court. The court also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and asserted that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in U.S. territories.


Where was the dred Scott case tried?

It was taken all the way to the Supreme Court, where the Chief Justice issued the controversial decision.


What problems might result from the Supreme Court's ruling in the Dred Scott case?

That all black people are banned from this country.


What problems might result from the supreme court's ruling in the Dred Scott court?

That all black people are banned from this country.


What problems might result from the supreme court ruling in the dred Scott case?

That all black people are banned from this country.


What controversial US Supreme Court ruling held African Americans had no rights and that Congress could not prohibit slavery in the territories?

The verdict in the Dred Scott case - denying the right of a slave to claim his freedom retrospectively, after having lived on free soil but then returned to slave country.


What did the supreme. court rule in the dred Scott case?

The ruling in the Dred Scott case allowed slave owners to take their slaves with them into the Western territories of the United States.


The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v Sandford 1857 helped to increase sectional conflict because the decision-?

The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857 worsened sectional conflict by declaring that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens and could not sue in the federal courts. This decision further entrenched divisions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and fed into the growing tensions that eventually led to the Civil War.