0
The balance of free and slave states in the senate was such an important issue because if the either had an advantage it would only help to trigger a war that was yet to come.
What else can I help you with?
What issue did the Missouri Compromise temporarily resolve?
The western expansion of slavery and the balance between slave and free states in the Senate
Why did the Missouri territory's application for statehood in 1819 create such a storm of controversy in the united states congress?
Missouri applied to be admitted as a slave state, and if admitted, would: A: Tip the balance of the federal Senate to the slave states, 24-22 B: Create a large lump of slave-permitting territory jutting out into the plains. Northerners didn't want the Senate to get off balance, and also didn't want the South to use Missouri as a springboard to creating more slave states in the plains.
How would you contrast the Northern and Southern positions on the annexation of Texas?
Southerners sought to extend slavery, already established in Texas. Northerners feared that annexation of more slave territory would tip the uneasy balance in the Senate in favor of slave states-and prompt war with Mexico.
The application for California statehood caused turmoil in Congress because?
It would upset the balance between the slave and free states in the Senate. By Paul A Rivera
What was the plan that preserved the balance between slave and free states and in the senate?
A series of compromises, starting with the Missouri Compromise of 1820.
Why was the balance of free and state slaves in the senate such an important issue?
The balance of free and slave states in the senate was such an important issue because if the either had an advantage it would only help to trigger a war that was yet to come.
How did the compromise solve the problem of keeping balance of power in the senate between free and slave states?
it was awesomew
Why was it important to the South that the number of slave states and free states be kept equal?
Actually, the balance was important to the slave states since they could block the outlawing of slavery because they would have an equal number of votes in the US Senate. If the number of free states was allowed to become larger than the number of slave states, then the slave states would have to rely on votes from Senators in free states to continue slavery.
What issue did the Missouri Compromise temporarily resolve?
The western expansion of slavery and the balance between slave and free states in the Senate
The admission of Missouri as a slave state was controversial in the senate because?
It was because they had an even number of slave and free states. If Missouri came in as a slave state then it would make it uneven and it would upset the balance.
Why did the Missouri territory's application for statehood in 1819 create such a storm of controversy in the united states congress?
Missouri applied to be admitted as a slave state, and if admitted, would: A: Tip the balance of the federal Senate to the slave states, 24-22 B: Create a large lump of slave-permitting territory jutting out into the plains. Northerners didn't want the Senate to get off balance, and also didn't want the South to use Missouri as a springboard to creating more slave states in the plains.
How would you contrast the Northern and Southern positions on the annexation of Texas?
Southerners sought to extend slavery, already established in Texas. Northerners feared that annexation of more slave territory would tip the uneasy balance in the Senate in favor of slave states-and prompt war with Mexico.
Why was the US relucten to annex Texas?
Because it was an area in which slavery was legal, and to bring it into the Union would destroy the balance in the Senate between slave states and non-slave states. Also because the U.S. didnt want :D
The application for California statehood caused turmoil in Congress because?
It would upset the balance between the slave and free states in the Senate. By Paul A Rivera
What was the plan that preserved the balance between slave and free states and in the senate?
A series of compromises, starting with the Missouri Compromise of 1820.
How did the admitting of the last four states affect the voting power slave states and free states in the US senate?
The admission of the last four states—California, Minnesota, Oregon, and Kansas—into the Union significantly impacted the balance of power in the Senate. California and Oregon entered as free states, while Kansas was a battleground over slavery, initially entering as a free state in 1861. This increased the representation of free states in the Senate, weakening the political power of slave states and contributing to the tensions leading up to the Civil War. Overall, the shift in Senate balance heightened the conflict between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions.
Why didn't the abolitionists want western states admitted to be slave states?
Before the Civil War, there was a perfect balance between "slave" states and "free" states. Neither side could budge the other, and no new states could be admitted to the Union without a vote of the Congress - more specifically, the Senate. So new states were admitted in pairs, one slave and one free, to preserve the balance. If one new "slave" state had been admitted to the Union, the majority of slave state senators would have been able to outvote the "free" state senators and admit more "slave" states. The balance was shattered when the southern states seceded from the United States, and the Civil War settled the issue - at the cost of a half-million dead.
