The blame for the murder of Thomas Becket was largely placed on the knights due to their direct involvement in the act, which was driven by their allegiance to King Henry II. The king's frustration with Becket's opposition to royal authority led to his infamous outburst, which the knights interpreted as a directive to take action against the archbishop. The knights, acting impulsively, believed they were serving the king's interests, but the murder ultimately reflected the deepening conflict between church and state in medieval England. This incident severely damaged the king's reputation and led to widespread condemnation of the knights' actions.
Becket was excommunicating his opponents in the church, and the king saw this as a nuisance. Henry II was speaking of killing him, but didn't actually mean it. His soldiers took it upon themselves to act in the king's interests and murdered him. This is why there was a memorial made for him; the King felt guilty.
beacuse they killed him
There reaction was what have we done and they ran to blame Henry x x x
because her husband thomas has been accused of taking land from the deceases and Abigail feels she has unfinished business with the putnams
Both are to blame , but the major blame is on John Kennedy.
The king was to blame for Thomas Becket's murder because he told the knights to kill Thomas but the knights didn't had to do what he said but they did and hit Thomas in the head and killed him. Also Thomas told the monks to leave the door open so the monks did. Also the king shouldn't have wanted to kill him anyway and the Knights had to obey the kings orders
Henry II punished the four knights by requiring them to serve in the Holy Land for a period of 14 years, which was considered a harsh form of penance. They were also fined sums of money as a form of punishment for their role in the murder of Thomas Becket.
The knights were to blame for Thomas's death because they acted under the influence of King Henry II's frustrated comments regarding Thomas Becket's opposition to royal authority. Their interpretation of the king's words incited them to take lethal action against Becket, whom they perceived as a traitor to the crown. This tragic outcome highlights the consequences of unchecked ambition and the volatile relationship between church and state during that era. Ultimately, their misguided loyalty to the king led to a violent act that resulted in Becket's martyrdom.
The people who killed Thomas Becket were 4 knights of King HenryII because they over heard a conversation saying that the king wanted Thomas gone. To show their loyalty they went to the cathedral.The knights tried to get Thomas out of Whatever the King said, it was interpreted as a royal command, and four knights, set out to the cathedral and tried to get Thomas out of the building (killing someone in a sacred place meant damnation) but he would not move so they struck his head with a sword and then stabbed him. The four knights were Reginald FitzUrs, Hugh de Moreville, William de Tracy and Richard le Breton. Henry the II made the remark in his room, " Who will rid me of this terbulent priest?" Henry actually said this out of anger but not in front of the four knights, they simply over heard him.
Becket was excommunicating his opponents in the church, and the king saw this as a nuisance. Henry II was speaking of killing him, but didn't actually mean it. His soldiers took it upon themselves to act in the king's interests and murdered him. This is why there was a memorial made for him; the King felt guilty.
beacuse they killed him
Many people were responsible for the murder of thomas beckett. you can't blame the knights because they were just cowardly enough to do it and not to question this "decision". the two main suspects were the king and thomas beckett himself. thomas beckett refused to listen to henry at all, so henry felt put out. beckett also decided to not listen to henry about "worshiping" him in a way.beckett only listened to god and the people that had strong beliefs that were to him right. But Henry was to blame as well because he just couldn't stand being ignored - he was an attention seeker. But he still had right to talk to beckett about his behaviour around this situation. Beckett just carried on to do things which were anoying Henry and it just built up into layers and layers of annoyance to Henry. So no wonder he popped, and wanted to get rid of Beckett. But overall I don't think that he meant all of this to turn into a murder. The person that was responsible for Becketts death was Beckett himself.
The British.
There reaction was what have we done and they ran to blame Henry x x x
because he wants brutus to take the blame for murder of caesar
Macbeth and Lady Macbeth plan to blame the murder of King Duncan on his chamberlains by framing them with the daggers used in the assassination.
society itself