answersLogoWhite

0

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

The quality of land in the west of Ireland would be poorer and there are more urban areas in the east and less agriculture. The land in the east would be better for growing a wider variety of crops. So the famine would naturally have hit people harder in the west.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?