ID1205554227 said:
i think it was justified to lunch not one but to boms on Japan to stop the war. i do wish there was a nother solution insted of the bom but sence there wasnt i do think the united states made the right choice.
^Maybe you should learn how to write properly before giving advice on dropping nukes. Or atleast learn how to click the "Spell check" button.
23 atomic bombs were being prepared in 1945 to drop on Japan, not just 2.
The other solution was available, landing and invasion. But this would have taken at least another year, over a million US troops lives and many million Japanese lives.
The atomic bombs saved well over an order of magnitude more lives than they cost.
There were no more atomic bombs to drop. Further, the Japanese government had already sued for peace.
To avoid an invasion of Japan
it caused japan to surrender after the second bomb being dropped
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the two Japanese cities on which atomic bombs were dropped.
The atomic bombs were delivered by the USS Indianoppolis
yes
BOOM
BOOM
Dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The dropping of two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
To "convince" Japan to surrender in WWII.
They really didn't. Japan had to surrender and that was all.
people
The dropping of two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
by the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Harry Truman authorized the use of atomic bombs against Japan.
Most people think so.