answersLogoWhite

0

Ain't nobody got money for that.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why was the stamp act unfair to the colonist?

The Stamp act was unfair to the colonist because the colonist were being taxed by Parliament without any saying in the taxation. Ergo, "No taxation without Representation!" the colonist just wanted to be represented. Also because it was the Britishs' fault for being in debt because of the french and Indian war. not the colonists'


Why were so many colonist in north America angered by the passage of the sugar and stamp acts?

they felt that they were being taxed without representation in parliament.


What British actions were unpopular with colonists why did they resist these actions?

The Stamp Act, among others, increased taxes on the colonists without them having any say over it. "Taxation without representation" was a major grievance of the colonists.


Why were the colonists so afraid of being taxed without?

The colonists did not want to be taxed without representation because it meant they had absolutely no say in government. It meant that they were under complete control of the monarchy in England.


What was thr main reason colonist protested taxation from king george?

Their problem was with taxation without representation regardless of what was being taxed. They were being forced to pay taxes but had no government representatives through whom they could voice grievances.


What was the complaint that many colonist had that said they had no voice in parliament yet decisions were being made?

No Taxation w/out representation


Why were the colonist angry about the British tea?

because the british kept taxing tea. thus raising the prices on it ^ closeish, but the real problem the Americans were having was that they were being taxed without elected representation.


Can taxation without representation mean being charged for a good or service without receiving it?

Not really, no. "No taxation without representation" means that no person should be forced to support a government that they are not represented in.


Why were the people (colonist) afraid of one person with all the power?

The Colinist were afraid that if one person had all of the power everything would end up being exactly the same as it was before they left England.


Why did colonist object to the sugar act?

the British planned to enforce this law. They were being taxed without any representation in the British Parliament.


What did the American colonist mean by no taxation without representation without?

They meant that the British would have to have a good reason for taxing the Americans. If there was not a good explanation, then there was reason for taxation.


Why did colonists think it was a problem to be taxed without representation?

The American colonists had a serious problem with being taxed without representation in Parliament. This was because they were given no say in the government that was taking their money.