0
What else can I help you with?
Who was the Viceroy when the Rowlatt Act passed?
Lord Chelmsford was the Viceroy of India when the Rowlatt Act passed.
What was The Rowlatt act?
The Rowlatt Act was were laws that allowed the government to jail protestors without a trial for as long as two years.
Who did the Indian protect against the rowlatt act in 1919?
The Indian population, particularly the leaders of the Indian National Congress and other nationalist groups, protested against the Rowlatt Act of 1919, which allowed for the detention of individuals without trial and imposed severe restrictions on civil liberties. Prominent figures like Mahatma Gandhi organized peaceful protests and civil disobedience campaigns to oppose the Act. The widespread discontent culminated in events like the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, which further galvanized the Indian independence movement.
Who supported Indian removal act?
yes people were against this act because you cool
What was the colonists' first act of violence against the British?
They killed indians. Feathers, not dots.
Why did the British pass Rowlatt Act?
the british started the rowlatt act in 1919
Who was the Viceroy when the Rowlatt Act passed?
Lord Chelmsford was the Viceroy of India when the Rowlatt Act passed.
What was The Rowlatt act?
The Rowlatt Act was were laws that allowed the government to jail protestors without a trial for as long as two years.
What was rowlatt act?
The Rowlatt Act was were laws that allowed the government to jail protestors without a trial for as long as two years.
What measures did rowlatt act seek to introduce?
The measures the Rowlatt Act introduced are emergency measures to deal with revolutionary activities.
Two prominent leaders of punjab were arrested in connection with the hartal against rowlatt act they are?
jawaharlal nehru and gandhi
When was the rowlatt act passed?
1919
The rowlatt act was passed in year?
1919
Why was rowlatt act passed?
The Rowlatt act was passed by the British in order to suppress nationalists who refused to be satisfied by official reforms and to keep a check on revolutionary terrorism.
How did the Rowlatt Act affected India?
The Amritsar Massacre developed out of protests against the Rowlatt Act (a series of laws which allowed the British to imprison Indians without trial, and allowed the British to suppress certain news stories from being reported in newspapers.) The Amritsar Massacre lasted for about ten minutes, in which time 1650 rounds of ammunition were fired upon a gathering of unarmed men, women and children who were peacefully protesting the Rowlatt Act. Over 1000 people were killed, and 2000 wounded. Winston Churchill said of the event that "The Indians were packed together so that one bullet would drive through three or four bodies". To answer your question, such brutality and suppression turned millions of moderate Indians from supporters of the British Raj into nationalists who would never again trust the British.
Why was the rowlatt act called black act?
The Rowlatt Act, enacted in 1919 by the British colonial government in India, was termed the "Black Act" because it repressed civil liberties and allowed for the arrest and detention of individuals without trial. It was perceived as an oppressive measure that curtailed freedom of speech and assembly, leading to widespread discontent among Indians. The act was seen as a blatant violation of rights, fueling nationalist sentiments and protests against British rule. Its harsh provisions sparked significant unrest, culminating in events like the Jallianwala Bagh massacre.
What was an rowlatt act explain the reactions of the people against this act?
The Rowlatt Act, enacted by the British government in India in 1919, allowed for the arrest and detention of Indians without trial, effectively curbing civil liberties in response to growing unrest. The act sparked widespread outrage among Indians, leading to protests and demonstrations, most notably the Jallianwala Bagh massacre in Amritsar in April 1919, where British troops opened fire on a peaceful gathering, killing hundreds. This brutal response intensified anti-colonial sentiments and galvanized the Indian independence movement, as people united against repressive colonial laws. The incident marked a turning point, prompting a broader push for self-rule and civil rights.
