Nomadic mongols were populating the region of Mongolia and coordinated with each of their regions.
Yes, the Huns and Mongols are not directly related. The Huns were a nomadic group from Central Asia who lived around 370-469 AD, while the Mongols were a separate nomadic group from the same region who emerged later, around the 13th century. Though they both originated from Central Asia, they were distinct groups with different histories and cultures.
I think the answer is 7, but I'm not positive
Yes, the Huns and the Mongols were both nomadic warrior groups from Central Asia, but they were not directly related to each other. The Huns were active in Europe during the late Roman Empire, while the Mongols emerged in the 13th century and established a vast empire in Asia.
The Mongols were a nomadic group of people who came from Mongolia and its surroundings like Inner Mongolia in China and Tuva in Russia. They created the biggest contiguous empire in history, from Eastern Europe to Korea to northern India to the Middle East.
no
pastoral nomadic
Pastoral nomadic.
Pastoral nomadic.
The Mongols were a nomadic people who created a vast empire in the 13th century.
yes they were they lived in yurts and traveled whenever they needed to
Because they were nomadic and lived in tents.
Nomadic mongols were populating the region of Mongolia and coordinated with each of their regions.
The mongols were a nomadic war tribe, they often used raiding war parties to conquer and overcome rivals.
mongols
Mongols
Sheepheard