Farmers had no variety in their diet, but foragers ate whatever they came upon. Also, if a farmers crops get damaged, they have no food, but a forager can just move on.
Skilled workers have better success with organizing than non-skilled because the skilled workers are harder to replace.
MORE THAN 3000 PEOPLE. Can't you believe it?!
Farmers were agriculturalists. They grew things on their farms.City dwellers were manufacturers. They made things, sold them for money so they could buy food from the farmers.
Greece was a much poorer country for agriculture; even the better parts could produce only coarse grains. However 'hard to live' has many facets, including politically and socially. The bulk of Greeks were peasant farmers as were Egyptians, but they developed a much better cultural lifestyle than the equivalent Egyptian peasant farmers.
It prevented railroads from charging farmers more than other customers-Apex
City workers in 1840 were likely less healthy than farmers due to poor living conditions in crowded urban areas, exposure to industrial pollutants, and limited access to nutritious food. The lack of sanitation, clean water, and proper medical care in cities contributed to higher rates of disease and health problems among urban workers compared to farmers living in rural areas with cleaner environments and more physically demanding, but less hazardous, work.
Skilled workers have better success with organizing than non-skilled because the skilled workers are harder to replace.
yes they are! they are wey better than fair traders!
Non-farm workers, including factory workers, averaged $1,400 per year. Farmers earned an average of $400 per year during the 1920's.
BTM is urban slang for "better than masturbation."
In 1840, city workers often faced harsh living conditions, including overcrowded housing, poor sanitation, and insufficient access to fresh air and green spaces, which contributed to their declining health. Many were employed in factories with long hours and hazardous environments, leading to physical strain and exposure to harmful substances. In contrast, farmers typically had more physical activity and access to fresh produce, which supported better overall health. Additionally, rural communities often had stronger social ties and support systems, further enhancing their well-being compared to urban workers.
Doctors are not better than farmers. Doctors and farmers both have a role to play in society. While in specific instances doctors can be very important, if both groups were to vanish, the absence of food would be noticed before the absence of plastic surgeons.
Non-farm workers, including factory workers, averaged $1,400 per year. Farmers earned an average of $400 per year during the 1920's.
City workers in 1840 might be less healthy than farmers due to the harsh living and working conditions in urban areas. They often faced overcrowding, poor sanitation, and limited access to clean water, leading to the spread of diseases. Additionally, factory work was typically more hazardous and involved long hours in unhealthy environments, while farmers engaged in more physical activity and had access to fresh air and food. This combination of factors contributed to a lower overall health status among city workers compared to their farming counterparts.
yep
No job profession is better than another, except for monetary reasons. With that said, teaching is better than farming because teachers get more money for what they do than what farmers get for what they produce. But that's really where it ends. Farmers can be and often are teachers and vice versa.
It is not helpful to claim that doctors are better than farmers; farming is an honorable profession and one upon which everybody, including doctors, depends, since we all need to eat. It is also true that it is much easier to learn how to farm, than to become a doctor. Medicine is a more skilled profession. Also, generally more highly paid.