Short answer? They really weren't. Vikings are a peculiar case as they are so surrounded in mis information, myth, and exageration. The vikings weren't towering blonde haired beserkers who took on evil Christians 1 on 10 and came victorious because of their crazy gods and bloodthirsty demeanor. They were just raiding men who took on easy targets to get some gold out of it. They were by no means push overs, a viking warrior was nothing to underestimate, they can more than hold their own, but they simply aren't extrodinary. They are the European version of the Japanese Samurai really, Samurai aren't worth the hype eather, Katana's weren't incredible blades and Samurai were by no means the greatest warriors around, they were more mediocre (actually below average) warriors.
That being said here's what they CAN do. They can size up an enemy, hit them where they're not and make away with the goods. They can overwhelm and outfight a simple militia force defending an outlying village. They could sail and make boats like no one else at the time. And that's about it, they are just your average raider.
But they can not take a proffessional army on, that's why they converted to Christianity (well, kind of, they just said they were christian) to resist provoking the powers from the south which the divided and tribal people of the vikings could never hope to defeat.
Yes, the Vikings used horses for transportation and warfare during their expeditions and raids.
The Vikings were actually quite successful, in their day. Yet there are no more Vikings left. That is because the Viking culture evolved into other social forms, not because they were defeated.
The Vikings were successful in part to their methods of combat. They essentially employed hit and run tactics to quickly raid an area and withdraw before any defensive forces had time to mobilize.
If by "solution for trench warfare", you mean a way to end trench warfare, then the invention and widescale use of tanks, bombers and the Blitzkrieg in WWII solved trench warfare.
It wasn't that unique. Francis Marion (the Swamp Fox) was successful during the American Revolutionary War; Quantrill was successful during the American Civil War (US Civil War)...as two examples. Nearly all wars have had and will continue to have some sort of "guerrilla" warfare.
Yes, the Vikings used horses for transportation and warfare during their expeditions and raids.
Not all vikings are men. There are women vikings, and according to some historical accounts, they took part in warfare along with men.
Prior to radar, you couldn't hit what you couldn't see.
He was forced.
The Vikings were actually quite successful, in their day. Yet there are no more Vikings left. That is because the Viking culture evolved into other social forms, not because they were defeated.
The Vikings were successful in part to their methods of combat. They essentially employed hit and run tactics to quickly raid an area and withdraw before any defensive forces had time to mobilize.
If by "solution for trench warfare", you mean a way to end trench warfare, then the invention and widescale use of tanks, bombers and the Blitzkrieg in WWII solved trench warfare.
It wasn't that unique. Francis Marion (the Swamp Fox) was successful during the American Revolutionary War; Quantrill was successful during the American Civil War (US Civil War)...as two examples. Nearly all wars have had and will continue to have some sort of "guerrilla" warfare.
Rome's government was so successful because the empire was so efficent. The Romans had paved roads and powerful armies to protect citizens too.
because they knew the way of the pokermom.
Became stupid
Yes, King Alfred the great did fight the Vikings, he did not lose, but he could not get, the Vikings out the country, so he just pushed them up to, a part of the country called, Danelaw. So he did fight the Vikings, yes.