answersLogoWhite

0

Roman troops often exhibited greater loyalty to their generals than to the emperor due to personal bonds formed during military campaigns, where shared experiences fostered loyalty and trust. Generals, who often came from the ranks of the army, understood the soldiers' needs and aspirations, creating a sense of camaraderie. Additionally, generals could offer tangible rewards, such as land and spoils of war, which directly benefitted the soldiers, further solidifying their allegiance. In times of political instability or perceived neglect from the emperor, soldiers might prioritize loyalty to their immediate commander over distant imperial authority.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who gave the roman military orders?

The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.The Roman military was given orders by their generals, their consuls or their emperor, depending on the times. Technically the consuls were in charge of the military, but the leadership of the various legions was delegated to the generals or the legates of the legion. To complicate matters further, the troops swore their oaths of allegiance to their generals during the republic, so it was the generals who the troops obeyed rather than the consuls. Augustus changed all this by establishing the principate and having the military swear their allegiance to him, as emperor.


What was a result when Roman generals and potential emperors clashed?

Because the Roman generals and potential emperors clashed, many roman generals became emperor, but they did not stay on the throne for more than 2 months


What change in the roman army was a result of the civil wars of the roman republic?

It became a paid army loyal to its generals.


What changes in the roman army was a result of the civil wars of the roman republic?

It became a paid army loyal to its generals.


What Roman Emperor ordered all his troops to be christianized?

I believe that was Constantine


Why were early Christians persecuted?

They would not worship the Emperor, and were not particularly loyal to the Roman Empire.


What was the name of the river that Ancient Roman generals were forbidden to bring their legions across?

Roman generals were required to disband their troops before crossing the Rubicon in northern Italy, for fear that they would stage a coup.


Who was the roman empire that boudicca fought?

If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.If you mean the Roman emperor when Boucdicca fought, it was Nero.


What was the nature of Roman Emperor power within the emperor system?

The onset of the "emperor" governing system was begun by Augustus Caesar. Roman emperors followed traditional ways of governing such as consulting with the Senate or the emperors generals. For the most part however, the emperor's powers were extremely strong.


Was the Germans that were hired by the Roman loyal?

Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.Yes, they were very loyal. In fact, the German Guard was used as the personal bodyguards for the emperor and his family.


Who was the last Roman Emperor to have control of Britain?

The last Roman who was meant to have control over Britain was Honorius , the last emperor of the western part of the Roman Empire. However, he lost control when Constantine III was proclaimed emperor by the Roman soldiers in Britain, took the remaining Roman troops on the island to Gaul and established himself as usurper emperor of Gaul and Britain.


When did the Romans leave England for the first time?

The first redeployment of Roman troops in was carried out by the usurper emperor Magnum Maximus, who took them to Gaul to depose the emperor Gratian and take over Gaul and Britannia in 383. This is the date for the last evidence of Roman presence in the north and the west. In 402 the Roman General Stilicho withdrew the last Roman troops form Hadrian's Wall to redeploy then in Italy, which was facing attacks by the Visigoths and the Ostrogoths. In 407 the usurper emperor Constantine took the remaining Roman troops in Britannia to Gaul. An appeal for help against Saxon raids was rejected by the Emperor Honorius in 410.