they had a big civilization
Ten causes would be: -Germanic people constantly invaded the Roman Empire -There was disease spread around the land -The empire couldn't afford military -There were some horrible rulers/emperors -People wouldn't pay taxes -It was very over populated There's some.
he would make the roman empire more powerful
It was actually not that easy to defend the empire as the barbarians (Barbarians is not a specific type of empire, it is just a Roman term for any-one not of Roman stature) would often attack the empire, but what would make it a little bit easy to defend is that the Roman empire had MASSIVE armies. Each army consited of a couple legions, each legion about a thousand soldiers.
Theme would include monarchy, early republic, middle republic, late republic, early empire and later empire. Region would include western part of the Roman Empire and eastern part of the Roman Empire. Period would include principate, pax Romana, crisis of the third century and dominate.
Okay, your question needs a twofold answer. First of all the Roman republic and the Roman empire were different entities. The Republic was/is a form of government; an empire is a large holding of some sort. The two are not identical. And no, Julius Caesar did not bring down the Roman republic. The republic had been dying or even considered dead since at least the time of the first triumvirate. Caesar merely was fortunate enough to take advantage of the opportunities that opened up for him.
There is not really a name for that, unless you would count members of Parliament/Congress as 'rulers' too. In that case, such an empire would be called a democracy.
Ten causes would be: -Germanic people constantly invaded the Roman Empire -There was disease spread around the land -The empire couldn't afford military -There were some horrible rulers/emperors -People wouldn't pay taxes -It was very over populated There's some.
One possibility would be the formation of the Holy Roman Empire (which was unfortunately neither Holy, Roman, nor an Empire).
he would make the roman empire more powerful
The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.The army would have been the protectors of the Roman empire.
The Eastern Empire would have probably fallen along with the Western Empire.
The Eastern Empire would have probably fallen along with the Western Empire.
The peace of Augsburg said that principalities in the Holy Roman Empire would follow the religion of the ruler. Spain, once it had thrown the Muslims out was never part of the Holy Roman Empire, but was Catholic from that point on, and the Kings of Spain used the Inquisition to keep the protestant revolutionaries from causing the death and destruction that they had caused elsewhere. Italy was part of the Holy Roman Empire but its rulers were always Catholic.
If they did, they would have a civil way
A Roman patriot would be an ancient Roman citizen who took pride in being a member of the Roman Empire.
It was actually not that easy to defend the empire as the barbarians (Barbarians is not a specific type of empire, it is just a Roman term for any-one not of Roman stature) would often attack the empire, but what would make it a little bit easy to defend is that the Roman empire had MASSIVE armies. Each army consited of a couple legions, each legion about a thousand soldiers.
To me, it would be Julius Caesar for uniting the Roman Empire.