0
I would rather have been a knight during feudal times, as they often enjoyed greater privileges, training in combat, and the potential for land ownership. Knights also had a role in protecting their communities and could gain respect and honor through their deeds. In contrast, peasants faced harsh living conditions, limited rights, and little opportunity for social mobility. The knight's life, despite its risks, offered a chance for adventure and a more substantial impact on society.
What else can I help you with?
What were the 5 levels of Japan's feudal system in the 800s?
Answer 1: emperor, shogun, daimyo, samurai, ronin Answer 2 : Ronin weren't really part of the feudal system; they were just samurai without a master (who were still samurai). You forgot peasants, which is rather stupid. I mean, where would everyone who wasn't nobility or a warrior go? Emperor, shogun, daimyo, samurai, peasant There's some controversy about merchants. The Japanese generally disrespected them because they lived and worked only for their own wealth. Some sources say that they are under the peasant and there are actually 6 tiers in the Japanese feudal system; others classified them as part of the peasants. I think it should be a separate tier, because the Japanese greatly respected peasants for giving them food, so it would clash, wouldn't it? But you asked for five, so if you can only have five I'd stop at peasants.
Why does hollister describe magna carta as a feudal document?
Hollister describes the Magna Carta as a feudal document because it emerged from the specific context of medieval England's feudal system, where power was decentralized and held by local lords. The Magna Carta primarily addressed the rights and privileges of the nobility, limiting the power of the king in relation to these feudal lords. It reinforced the existing social hierarchy and the obligations between lords and vassals, highlighting the document's roots in feudal relationships rather than broader democratic principles.
Is a merchant a peasant?
No, a merchant is not a peasant. A merchant is typically someone engaged in trade, buying and selling goods, often seeking profit and operating within a market economy. In contrast, a peasant is usually a rural laborer or farmer who works the land and is often tied to agricultural production, with a focus on subsistence rather than trade. The two roles historically occupy different social and economic positions.
What was the influence of the Emperor during Shogun era Japan on peasants?
During the Shogun era in Japan, the Emperor held a largely symbolic and religious role, while real political power was wielded by the shogunate. This meant that peasants were primarily affected by the local daimyōs (feudal lords) and the shogun's policies rather than by the Emperor directly. While the Emperor's authority was acknowledged, the shogunate's governance dictated the peasants' lives through taxation, labor obligations, and agricultural practices. Consequently, the Emperor's influence on peasants was minimal, as their daily realities were shaped by the feudal hierarchy and local governance.
Why did Chinese peasants support the communists and Mao Zedong rather than the nationalists led by chiang Kai-shek?
Chinese peasants supported the communists and Mao Zedong primarily because the communists promised land reforms and an end to the feudal system, which directly addressed their economic hardships. In contrast, the Nationalists under Chiang Kai-shek were seen as corrupt and largely focused on urban elites, often neglecting the needs of rural populations. Additionally, the communists effectively mobilized peasant support through grassroots organizing and by promoting social equality, which resonated deeply with the agrarian majority. This combination of land promises and grassroots appeal ultimately swayed peasant loyalty towards the communists.
What pilgrim was in the feudal system?
Pilgrims were individuals who undertook religious journeys for spiritual reasons and were not directly tied to the feudal system, which was a social structure based on land ownership and obligations. While some pilgrims may have interacted with the feudal society during their travels, their primary purpose was religious devotion rather than a formal part of the feudal hierarchy.
How would a knight treat a promise he made during the middle ages?
As a general rule, a medieval knight took his promises extremely seriously. It would not have been unusual to die, rather than break a promise.
What are the difference of feudal japan and Europe?
The differences in feudal Japan to feudal Europe are very noticeable.1. Culture & BeliefsFeudal JapanIn feudal times Japan's major religion was Buddhism and Confucianism, they believed in honour and loyalty. This can be seen in the samurai, the knights of Japan in the feudal ages. Samurai were willing to die for their nation and commit seppuku (ritual suicide) to keep their honour rather than be killed or captured by their enemy.Feudal EuropeThe religion in Feudal Europe was Christianity. In feudal times Europe was very superstitious and the land was governed by the church. The church's laws were mainly based on their views of The Bible. People who showed any signs of witchcraft were sent to be executed. Things like black cats were seen as bad luck. All these things were around during feudal times in Europe.2. WarfareFeudal JapanFeudal Japan's warfare was different to Europe's because it was greatly influenced by their beliefs. As mentioned before Samurai's would commit seppuku (ritual suicide) to keep their honour. Their swords such as the katanas were different to the knight's sword. A samurai's armour would also be different; samurai would wear masks in an attempt to scare their foe. They would have less metl covering them than a knight would as well. Feudal Japan also had castles, at the beginning though they were made of wood and later became stone because of fire.Feudal EuropeIn Feudal times Europe had knights in shining armour. These knights would not suicide in the face of defeat but they would pray at least three times a day to God. They were meant to be good Christians and helpers to the needy. Unlike the Samurai they wore a lot of armour, the feudal 'tank'. A normal foot soldier stood no chance to a knight. Feudal Europe also had castles similar to Japan's.But both feudal Japan & Europe shared similarities as well. Their hierarchy was quite similar, both divided into two groups: Nobles & Peasants.
Was life easy or hard for knights?
It was some what more easier than being a peasant(rather than constantly farming,cooking,etc) , but as a knight you have to go to war , and make sure you dont die every single time you wonder for a quest or even defending your property
When did feudalism dominate Western Europe?
Feudalism dominated political life in Western Europe from the 9th Century to the beginning of the 14th Century. Feudal lords, rather than kings were the powerful rulers during this time in history.
What were the 5 levels of Japan's feudal system in the 800s?
Answer 1: emperor, shogun, daimyo, samurai, ronin Answer 2 : Ronin weren't really part of the feudal system; they were just samurai without a master (who were still samurai). You forgot peasants, which is rather stupid. I mean, where would everyone who wasn't nobility or a warrior go? Emperor, shogun, daimyo, samurai, peasant There's some controversy about merchants. The Japanese generally disrespected them because they lived and worked only for their own wealth. Some sources say that they are under the peasant and there are actually 6 tiers in the Japanese feudal system; others classified them as part of the peasants. I think it should be a separate tier, because the Japanese greatly respected peasants for giving them food, so it would clash, wouldn't it? But you asked for five, so if you can only have five I'd stop at peasants.
What is peasant war?
the criteria of definition must be structural and relational, rather than mere occupational basis.
Can you be a peasant in Sims medieval?
In "The Sims Medieval," players can create and control various characters, including nobles and villagers, but the game does not specifically label characters as "peasants." Instead, players can choose to play as a hero sim with different roles, such as a knight or a merchant, while managing the kingdom's needs and resources. The game focuses on quests and storylines, allowing for a range of social classes, but the concept of being a peasant is more abstract and integrated into the overall gameplay dynamics rather than a distinct character type.
Why does hollister describe magna carta as a feudal document?
Hollister describes the Magna Carta as a feudal document because it emerged from the specific context of medieval England's feudal system, where power was decentralized and held by local lords. The Magna Carta primarily addressed the rights and privileges of the nobility, limiting the power of the king in relation to these feudal lords. It reinforced the existing social hierarchy and the obligations between lords and vassals, highlighting the document's roots in feudal relationships rather than broader democratic principles.
In sir Gawain and the Green Knight what prevents Gawain's death?
In "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight," Gawain's death is ultimately prevented by the Green Knight's revelation that the whole challenge was a test of character rather than a straightforward death sentence. When Gawain flinches during the initial blow, the Green Knight acknowledges his humanity and chooses to spare him. Additionally, Gawain's honesty and courage in facing the challenge—despite his moment of weakness—earn him a reprieve and teach him valuable lessons about honor and humility.
Is a merchant a peasant?
No, a merchant is not a peasant. A merchant is typically someone engaged in trade, buying and selling goods, often seeking profit and operating within a market economy. In contrast, a peasant is usually a rural laborer or farmer who works the land and is often tied to agricultural production, with a focus on subsistence rather than trade. The two roles historically occupy different social and economic positions.
What were knights like in the 1500s?
In the 1500s, knights were still elite warriors who were part of the nobility. They were trained in combat skills such as swordsmanship and horsemanship. However, their role was becoming more ceremonial and less focused on actual battlefield combat due to advancements in warfare technology.
