wit swag
AnswerAbsolute monarchs are people who forcefully take power by either gaining their power from the army or having a powerful family that had many followers. I believe that absolute monarchs are dumb for even trying to forcefully take power from the people while also knowing that they were going to sometime fall. Also knowing that if they finally fall, that means DEATH!!!!!!
The powers of an emperor depend on what type of empire he heads. Most modern emperors are constitutional monarchs and really have very little actual power, as the power is concentrated in the hands of the people. The ancient emperors, such as the Roman and Chinese emperors, had unlimited powers and unlimited authority.
The Crusades significantly enhanced the power and influence of monarchs and popes in medieval Europe. Monarchs, by leading or supporting the Crusades, could consolidate power, gain prestige, and unify their realms under a common cause, often increasing their control over noble factions. Meanwhile, popes strengthened their spiritual authority and political influence by positioning themselves as leaders of Christendom, promoting the idea of holy war, and fostering a sense of unity among Christians. However, the Crusades also led to tensions between secular rulers and the papacy, as both sought to assert their dominance in the religious and political spheres.
The Renaissance, with its emphasis on humanism and the revival of classical knowledge, contributed to the rise of independent monarchs by promoting centralized authority and diminishing the power of feudal lords. As monarchs embraced Renaissance ideals, they sought to strengthen their legitimacy and control over their realms through patronage of the arts and education. This period also fostered the development of more sophisticated bureaucracies, allowing monarchs to consolidate power and reduce the influence of competing nobility. Ultimately, the Renaissance laid the groundwork for the emergence of absolute monarchy in Europe.
Leaders or rulers of countries. Monarchs today have far less power generally, than they did in medieval times.
true
Where did the Monarchs get there Power
Where did the Monarchs get there Power
Medieval monarchs used propaganda to legitimize their rule by portraying themselves as chosen by God or destiny. They employed symbols, ceremonies, and artworks to enhance their image of power and authority. Propaganda was crucial in maintaining control over the population and fostering loyalty among subjects.
Centralize their political control over their nations.To centralize means to concentrate. In an effort to concentrate (increase) their power, Louis XIV and Peter the Great carried on wars, did little to support freedom, and longed to extend their borders.
Absolute monarchs of medieval Europe typically employed methods such as centralizing authority, controlling the nobility, and using military force to preserve their power. However, they did not commonly use democratic processes or popular consent, as these would contradict the principles of absolute monarchy. Instead, they relied on hereditary rule and divine right to legitimize their authority.
the power of absolute monarchs is unlimited
People often fold their hands when they pray as a sign of respect, humility, and focus. This gesture can help individuals concentrate on their prayers and show reverence towards a higher power.
There must be more answers than this but mainly it put an end to hereditary power by monarchs and (in theory) put power into the hands of the people (democracy) and that is quite a change...
Monarchs, the church, and the Crusades were intertwined in medieval Europe. Monarchs often worked closely with the church to validate their rule and gain divine support. The Crusades were military campaigns sanctioned by the church, led by monarchs, with the goal of reclaiming the Holy Land from Muslim control. This collaboration between all three entities shaped the power dynamics and religious landscape of Europe during this period.
It limited the monarch's powers, saying that the king is not above the law, that the king is subject to the law.