If the Catholic Church had not already significant prestige and power, Pope Urban's call for a Crusade would have had no response. In fact the response to the call to defend the Eastern Christian Empire of Byzantium against a devastating attack from the Islamic Seljuk Turks was overwhelming. The idea of freeing Jerusalem from Muslim rule also caught the popular imagination. The almost miraculouys success of the First crusade in capturing Jerusalem enormously boosted the standing and prestige of the Church. The continuing draining battle to maintain a foothold in Palestine slowly exhausted much of the original Crusading zeal, and European states began to follow their own quarrels and national interests once more. The fall of Constantinople to rebel soldiers of the 4th Crusade, weakened the Orthodox Church and left a legacy of bitterness between Eastern and Western Christians.
The Crusades primarily benefited the papacy and the Roman Catholic Church, as they significantly increased the Church's influence and authority in Europe. The successful mobilization of armies and resources under the banner of Christianity reinforced the pope's role as a leader of Christendom. Additionally, various monarchs and nobles gained power by acquiring land and wealth during the campaigns, but overall, the Church emerged as the most powerful institution in the aftermath of the Crusades.
The peasants had no choice except to do as they were told. Those in charge stood to gain power, money and land. Also, at that time almost everyone was a faithful member of the Catholic church, and believed that by fighting in the crusades they gained their own salvation. In addition, the peasants were freed from their boring farming tasks if they chose to fight.
They wanted to gain power since they asked the pope for help
some motives for joining the crusades, where to gain wealth, to be forgiven your sins by helping the pope, and to have an adventure and prove your bravery.
There are many reforms of the catholic church in the middle ages. Just a few are canon law (the laws made by the pope), the practice of simony (paying the pope or a bishop to become a priest) and the marriage of the clergy. Most of these reforms were used so the Church and the pope could gain power. Pope Gregory VII outlawed marriage of the clergy. Some say he did this so the offspring of married priests would not inherit the land that the Church owned. I'm sure there are many more reforms of the middle ages you can look into.
they always were there for them and always helping them.
The Crusades primarily benefited the papacy and the Roman Catholic Church, as they significantly increased the Church's influence and authority in Europe. The successful mobilization of armies and resources under the banner of Christianity reinforced the pope's role as a leader of Christendom. Additionally, various monarchs and nobles gained power by acquiring land and wealth during the campaigns, but overall, the Church emerged as the most powerful institution in the aftermath of the Crusades.
The peasants had no choice except to do as they were told. Those in charge stood to gain power, money and land. Also, at that time almost everyone was a faithful member of the Catholic church, and believed that by fighting in the crusades they gained their own salvation. In addition, the peasants were freed from their boring farming tasks if they chose to fight.
Monarchs, the church, and the Crusades were intertwined in medieval Europe. Monarchs often worked closely with the church to validate their rule and gain divine support. The Crusades were military campaigns sanctioned by the church, led by monarchs, with the goal of reclaiming the Holy Land from Muslim control. This collaboration between all three entities shaped the power dynamics and religious landscape of Europe during this period.
From 1100 a.d. onwards. It was to gain back the Holy Land from the Muslims.
They wanted to gain power since they asked the pope for help
Juan Perón had a complex relationship with the Catholic Church in Argentina. He initially had strong support from the church, which helped him gain power. However, tensions emerged as Perón's policies, such as his focus on workers' rights and social justice, conflicted with some aspects of Catholic doctrine. Perón later faced criticism from some in the church, leading to a strained relationship.
When Henry VIII left the Catholic Church, he gained significant political and financial advantages. Firstly, he established the Church of England, which allowed him to consolidate religious authority under his control, diminishing the power of the Pope and the Catholic Church in England. Secondly, by seizing church lands and wealth, he significantly increased the crown's revenue, enabling him to fund his military campaigns and strengthen his monarchy.
A:The power of the Catholic Church, both temporally and spiritually, has ebbed and waned throughout history. A high point followed the eighth-century forgery of the Donation of Constantine, which Pope Stephen II successfully used to have lands "restored" to the Church, creating the Papal States. The Church was probably at its weakest when Emperor Charles defeated the army of Pope Clement VII and entered Rome in 1527. Charles seriously considered disbanding the papacy, but was dissuaded, uncertain of the outcome if the Catholic Church found itself leaderless. Charles imposed conditions, including that Clement call a Council to reform the Church, a condition Clement was continually able to postpone until his death. In the longer term, it was the Protestant Reformation that resulted in a decline in the absolute power of the Catholic Church, as it no longer had a monopoly on the beliefs of Christians. It was not until 1965 that the Catholic Church actually recognised this reality, when the Second Vatican Council pronounced the right of all to religious liberty, with the right to worship in whatever way they wished. Almost five hundred years after the time of King Henry VIII and Luther, the Church at last accepted its permanent loss of its previous power..Catholic AnswerFirst of all, there is no "Roman Catholic Church". It's just Catholic, not Roman Catholic. Roman is an epithet first commonly used in England after the protestant revolt to describe the Catholic Church. It is never used by the official Catholic Church. Secondly, the Catholic Church never looked at its "power" as secular power, or the power that you are asking about. Individuals within the Church, no doubt, over the centuries have sought to gain secular power, and at some points in history Bishops and Popes had a lot of secular power, but this has never been the mission of the Church, the Church's power has always been that of her Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, and when she gets away from that, things go awry. In that sense, the Church's "power" cannot decline, only her perceived "power" in the secular world.
The Reformed Church is Protestant, I believe.
1000×90=
A nonreligious reason for the Crusades was the desire for political power and expansion of territories. Many leaders and nobles saw the Crusades as an opportunity to gain wealth and land, increase their influence, and consolidate their power in the region. Economic motivations, such as trade opportunities and access to resources, also played a significant role in the Crusades.