Historians do research, analyze their research and publish facts, events and people from the past. By reading history books and attending lectures by professors of history, knowledge about the past is learned by the person seeking such information.
A multi-disciplinary approach on history involves drawing of multiple disciplines to redefine the history outside of normal boundaries of traditional writings. Vedas,Puranas,writings of foreigners,travellers,old historians,modern historians,philosophers,thinkers and creative writers should be taken for preparing the history.Archives,Archeology and Geography could alos be considered while approaching the history of a country.
Fossils, Artifacts, or they search in libraries for history books or old books about the past.
Historians of today and those of the past base their writings on many factors, one unfortunately is a bias they may or may not be aware of. One thing is a certainty, all historians have a cultural background that differs in many ways from one another. Clearly there will be different views of various past events depending on a variety of factors. Historians of today's Russia will have different views of the history of the Soviet Union, depending upon their political bias or lack of them. The ordinary person, one without a political or cultural bias will now as in the past, believe the "history" that best suits themselves. Of course, there is no consensus of how people of any particular period of time, viewed history. There are too many variables, too many different peoples, too many different time periods. What is clear today as it has always been, historians have written different versions of the same periods of time and events. There can be no proven way to determine if recent historians have changed the way people view history. This is true if only based on intellectual thought. There can be no "proof" for lack of a better term that anything has changed because the historians of today have the same views, accurate or inaccurate today as in the past. Any historian or student of history will agree to that,.
because its history
well , to no about history is very important ! if we didnt no history we wouldn't have so much knowledge ! bassically we wouldn't need to go to history class ! and historians only became historians cause basically they love history and want to know more about it !!
You need sources to be able to unravel history.
Because a historians job is to know the history of our civilization. Hence the name "historian". If our history weren't recognized then future generations would have no clue where they even came from.
Aztec codices are important because these codices held the history of how life was for the Aztecs.
Because many black historians did things that are very important a lot of the things we use today are made by black Americans. Without most of our black historians, we wouldn't have a lot of things.
they study the history of our world and the continents such as america
To understand how the study of history has changed over time
Historians study world history to gain knowledge......
Aztec codices are important because these codices held the history of how life was for the Aztecs.
what does history mean
Chronology is an important social study skill that allows historians to sequence events in order to understand the flow of history. By placing events in the correct order, historians can analyze cause-and-effect relationships and draw conclusions about the past.
Historians