That depends on a number of things, but a good general answer is "between two and four pounds." A Roman-style gladius will be lighter than a Celt-Iberian falcata, for instance; a copper sword will be lighter than one forged of bronze or iron.
Peasants and servants had to do many things in the medieval castle. Some of the jobs was to clean the floor, farming, cooking, washing the kings, queens, knights, and nobles clothes, and much, much more.also to What_work_did_peasants_doon the farm land
Oh, dude, medieval knights lived in castles, not just any old house. These castles were like the ultimate man caves, with big stone walls, drawbridges, and probably a moat for those days when you just want some alone time. And let's not forget the suits of armor, because every knight needs a fancy outfit for a night out.
about 5 silvers a year
The knowledge of other cultures effected the medieval society. How it effected the medieval society is there other belief's, values, money and society. The beliefs what people had in different gods and Churches than the medieval society had. The different technology they used, the values what they give and how much money they had. This effected medieval society.
The 14th century was in the Middle Ages or medieval times, but the Middle Ages lasted from the 5th century to the 15th, and so included much more.
$5,698 dollars
A typical knight's sword weighs around 2 to 4 pounds, depending on its size and design. The weight was balanced for effective handling in combat while still being able to deliver powerful strikes.
15 kg.
30 to 50 Kg
approximately 25 lbs
The metal sword weighed 10lbs while a fiberglass stunt sword rigged to spray blood must have been much less. This info. Came from a movie prop website.
They had pretty much choices, they wee swords, maces, or polearm. By: Kevin ham
Medieval swords were much longer and used for slashing. The Roman infantry swords were shorter, and although Roman cavalry used a longer sword, they were still shorter than Medieval swords. The Roman sword was intended primarily for stabbing. It may be impossible to say which was better. In Medieval times armies were smaller than in Roman times because no one could afford to maintain the huge standing armies which once made the Roman sword so effective in battle. I think that each was the right sword for its time.
There was no such thing as a swordsman in medieval times, although most knights carried a sword. This was essentially a last resort weapon and could not be used for "fencing" - it was usually designed for slashing and cutting. A knight also carried a shield, making the sword a single-hand weapon during most of the period. The main weapon for both knights and infantry (serjantz) was a spear or one of its derivatives . This had the advantage of keeping the enemy at more than arm's length away, reducing the risk of injury to oneself; using the sword or other close-combat weapon increased this risk because the enemy must automatically be closer. In the immediate post-medieval Renaissance era the sword became a much more widely-used weapon, with fencing schools starting up and mercenary troops such as Condotierri using almost entirely crossbows, swords and firerams.
It depends if you talking about a long sword-about 4.5 pounds to 5 pounds (or possably 6 and up if its a bastard sword) because the long sword was the standard for the typical 'knight in shining armor' way back when.
A medieval key would typically weigh around 2-4 ounces, depending on the size and material used. Keys during this time were often made of iron or bronze.
well a steel sword can very in weight. But i bet it is very heavy.