It was a success because the Europeans were introduced to the knowledge of the ancient past that was being preserved by the Muslims. It was a failure because they never regained the Holy Land. (Which explains why it's called 'history's most successful failure.')
b
The later Crusades differed from the first in several key ways. While the First Crusade was characterized by a spontaneous, popular movement fueled by religious fervor and a clear goal of reclaiming Jerusalem, the later Crusades often involved more organized military campaigns with political motivations and alliances. Additionally, the later Crusades faced greater logistical challenges, diminishing support from Europe, and a growing sense of disillusionment regarding the original religious goals, leading to more fragmented and less effective efforts. Ultimately, the later Crusades struggled to achieve significant success compared to the initial conquest of Jerusalem in 1099.
The Crusades generated that the church could even make a huge mob to kill anything they disliked, which shows power.
The 3 ways is that,1.Merchants and ship owners from the cities saw opportunities to expand their markets and increase their commercial bases.2.Crusades gave him a chance to escape the slavery of manorial life.3.Improvment in ones economic status convinced many people to join the Crusades
they attacked and conquered them until hy got what they wanted!! :]
da wayz a pyramed iz suces und falure iz dat pyramidz r kewl but r also stewpit
b
The later Crusades differed from the first in several key ways. While the First Crusade was characterized by a spontaneous, popular movement fueled by religious fervor and a clear goal of reclaiming Jerusalem, the later Crusades often involved more organized military campaigns with political motivations and alliances. Additionally, the later Crusades faced greater logistical challenges, diminishing support from Europe, and a growing sense of disillusionment regarding the original religious goals, leading to more fragmented and less effective efforts. Ultimately, the later Crusades struggled to achieve significant success compared to the initial conquest of Jerusalem in 1099.
In certain ways the mission was a success. According to its mandate and purpose UNOC was successful. Katanga was reintergrated back into Congolese territory and the violence stopped. The United Nations military troops were able to withdraw and civil war was prevented.
The Crusades generated that the church could even make a huge mob to kill anything they disliked, which shows power.
The Crusades generated that the church could even make a huge mob to kill anything they disliked, which shows power.
The Crusades generated that the church could even make a huge mob to kill anything they disliked, which shows power.
They are both great quarterbacks but you have to look at it in a couple ways. Tebow is better if you look at both his success and the teams success. I think Bradford is better based on his stats but he doesn't have 2 national championships.
Single-mindedness and prepared to go against the crowd, and to be able to bounce back quickly from failure or defeat. However, success is measured in different ways. One can be successful in business, but not very sucessful as a family person. So it all depends on how one measures success.
The 3 ways is that,1.Merchants and ship owners from the cities saw opportunities to expand their markets and increase their commercial bases.2.Crusades gave him a chance to escape the slavery of manorial life.3.Improvment in ones economic status convinced many people to join the Crusades
Failure mode effects analysis (FMEA) is used to identify the ways in which a system will fail, the likelihood of each failure mode, and what will happen in the event of each failure. It is used in both product design, to improve intrinsic availability and reliability, and in operations management, to improve process design.
they attacked and conquered them until hy got what they wanted!! :]