No, a city and a civilization are not the same thing. A city is a specific geographical location characterized by a large population and infrastructure, often serving as a center for commerce, culture, and governance. In contrast, a civilization encompasses a broader concept that includes the social, political, economic, and cultural systems of a society, often comprising multiple cities and communities. Thus, while cities can be integral parts of a civilization, they do not define it entirely.
its latin for city
nomadic people slow every thing when they contributed to their civilization because their contribution messed every thing up duston domervil
A little of each. The dividing line is the Greenwich Meridian, which passes right through Greenwich England. Keep in mind that "western hemisphere" and "Western Civilization" are not the same thing.
One thing to remember is that there were no year 0 so the answer is 984 years.
The Aztecs we a people which would be called a civilization or a society of which people were learning in advance pace or just learning and building thing such as technology so yes I would call the Aztec, Incas ,and Mayas a civilization.
No a town is not the same thing. a town is a small area of a big city
city is a public then city is a lnd fill
Same Thing
No a town is not the same thing. a town is a small area of a big city
Well basically it is both the same
I think you may have typed the same thing twice... Because what you have typed is the same thing.
A "capital" and a "capital city" are exactly the same thing.
no
No
Tenochtitlan and the Aztecs are not the exact same thing. Tenochtitlan was the capital city of the Aztec empire. The Aztecs built the city of Tenochtitlan in the location where Mexico City is currently located.
The Aztec civilization.
I'm wondering the same thing.